Baikunth Lal v. Central Public Works Department

Delhi High Court · 30 Aug 2011 · 2011:DHC:17495
S. Muralidhar
W. P. (C) 6331/2011
2011:DHC:17495
administrative petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners to withdraw their writ petitions with liberty to pursue other remedies, dismissing the petitions as withdrawn.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
#51 #56
W. P. (C) 6331/2011
BAIKUNTH LAL , ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ajit Kumar Pande, Advocate.
VERSUS
CENTRAL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 00000 Respondent
Through: Mr. Rajinder Nischal, Advocate.
W. P. (C) 6337/2011
JOGINDER SINGH oooo· Petitioner
VERSUS
KIRTIRAM
VERSUS
AND
W. P. (C) 6339/2011
00000 Petitioner W. P. (C) Nos. 6331, 6337 & 6339!2011 Page I of2
2011:DHC:17495
CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR
30.08.2011 CM APPL No. 12726-27 of 2011 (for exemption) in W. P. (C) 6331/2011
CM APPL No. 12736-37 of2011 (for exemption) in W. P. (C) 6337/2011
CM APPL No. 12741-42 of 2011 (for exemption) in W. P. (C) 6339/2011
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
The applications are disposed of.
W. P. (C) 6331/2011 and CM APPL No.12725/2011 (for stay)
W. P. (C) 6337/2011 and CM APPL No. 12735/2011 (for stay)
W. P. (C) 6339/2011 and CM APPL No. 12740/2011 (for stay)
ORDER

1. Learned counsel for the Petitioners seeks leave to withdraw these writ petitions to seek appropriate remedies as may be available to the Petitioners in accordance with law.

2. The writ petitions and the applications are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

W. P. (C) Nos. 6331, 6337 & 6339/20II

S. MURALIDHAR, J