d1993a5ffff76e9a00c4538dc2db5de3c9786de2e0e51ac17d0340c7093c6717

Delhi High Court · 30 Aug 2011 · 2011:DHC:16953
1/ of the fact that the disputes between the parties have been resolved the complainant does not want to pursue the present complaint.; {, MUKTA GUPTA,J AUGUST 30,2011 ! 'gat t::.'( s*fG_tq5 q; >€ eYAn- /e\$^41-; . p4.Itr.; > /(QG/sL ler4^f{*,ru >oo7 2011
2011:DHC:16953
criminal petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 498A IPC following reconciliation between parties and withdrawal of complaint by the complainant.

Full Text
Translation output
:'\"..a v $-68 HIGH COURT OF DELHI w.P.(cRL) r2Qstz0rr
VINAY KUMAR @ DINAY KI.IMAR & ORS. ..... Petitioner
Through lVIr. Deepak Kumar, Adv. with Petitioners in person.
VETSUS
STATE & ORS. rhrough Mr. Manoj ohri, Api; ff'#liTlt
SI Amit Malik, P.S. New Usman Pur.
Mr. Sunil Kumar, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA o/o Crl.M.A. 1026212011
30.08.2011 Exemption allowed subject to just exception. w.P.(cRL) 1205/2011
This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 4312011 under Sections t 4I8N34IPC registered at PS New Usman Pur, Delhi.
The complainantlRespondent No. 2 is present in person who is identified by the Investigating Officer and her counsel. The complainant states that the disputes between the Petitioner No. 1 and her have been amicably resolved and they are living together as husband and wife. In view tt
: w.P.(cRL) 120s/2011 page I of 2 2011:DHC:16953
1/ of the fact that the disputes between the parties have been resolved the complainant does not want to pursue the present complaint.
Since the parties have amicably resolved their difference and the pendency of the present proceedings will bring further acrimony and disharmony between the two, it would be in the interest of justice if the present FIR i! quashed.
Accordingly, FIR No. 4312011 under Sections 498N34IPC registered at PS New Usman Pur, Delhi and the proceedings pursuant thereto are quashed.
Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court.
Petition is disposed of. Order dasti. flrr-W;,+'"L
{, MUKTA GUPTA,J AUGUST 30,2011 ! 'gat t::.'( s*fG_tq5 q
Pd.r.t"-L w.P.(cRL) 120s/2011 r$rdl \*Y J. -eX^^zil,tA *\!s+= h}s\"q
>€ eYAn- /e\$^41-
. p4.Itr.
> /(QG/sL ler4^f{*,ru >oo7 2011:DHC:16953
JUDGMENT