Jagdish Tokas v. State

Delhi High Court · 30 Aug 2011 · 2011:DHC:16861
Mukta Gupta
W.P.(CRL) 1878/2010
2011:DHC:16861
criminal petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking protection due to non-prosecution and absence of the petitioner and his counsel, following rejection of the relief by the DLSA.

Full Text
Translation output
46# $- HIGH COURT OF DELHI w.P.(cRL) 1878i2010
JAGDISH TOKAS ""' Petitioner
Through: None.
VETSUS
STATE & ANR ""' ResPondent
Through: X{r. Nikhil A. Menon, Advocate for Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Additional
Standing Counsel for the State with SI. Sunil Sarwani, PS Vasant Vihar'
CORAM:
IION'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
30.08..20L1 By this petition the Petitioner has sought protection'
On the last date of hearing learned counsel for the Petitioner had sought discharge since he had no instructions in the matter.
On the last date the Petitioner was not present. Today also.neither the petitioner is present nor anybody on his behalf is present.
Status report has been filed which shows that even the prayer of the
Petitioner for grant of protection has even been rejected by the DLSA'
Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
I^M/7^/rU- MUKTA GUPTA, J.
AUGUST 30, 201L/'vn' 2011:DHC:16861
JUDGMENT