Mr. Rajesh R. Chaudhary and Mr. R. Nadim, Advs. v. STATE & ANR .....

1. Issue notice. Ld. APP accepts notice on behalf of State-R.-l and Mr. Davinder Nath Dawan, Adv. accepts notice on behalf of R-2.

2. Ld. counsel for the petitioner submits that vide FIR No.64 dated 14.03.2001 a case was registered at PS Mayur Vihar Phase- I, Delhi under Sections 498-A/406/34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 against petitioner No.1 (husband) and petitioner Nos.[2] and 3 (relatives of petitioner No.1).

3. Ld. counsel for the petitioner further submits that vide compromise deed dated 27.08.2011, the parties have reconciled 2011:DHC:9736 the matter and started living together as husband and wife fothe last 10 years.

4. Respondent No.2 Kausar is present in person in Court with her counsel, who identifies her.

5. Respondent No.2 submits that no dispute is pending qua the aforesaid FIR, therefore, the same may be quashed.

6. Since the matter has been compromised vide CompromisE: Deed dated 27.08.2011 and petitioner No.1 and respondent No.L are leading happy married life, in the interest of justice I quasithe FIR No.64 dated 14.03.2001 registered at PS Mayur Vihar Phase-1, Delhi under Sections 498-A/406/34 Indian Penal Code 1860 against petitioner No.1 (husband) and petitioner Nos.[2] anc 3 (relatives of petitioner No.1) by respondent No.2 and also defer~ imposing cost on the petitioner No.1.

7. CRL.M.C. 2894/2011 is allowed in the above terms.

8. Dasti.

AUGUST 30, 2011 vld ~ SURESH KAIT, J