Full Text
Translation output
56#$~ HIGH COURT OF DELHI o;o
CRL.M.C. 2892/2011
NARENDER KUMAR & ORS ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Rajiv Kumar, Advocate
CRL.M.C. 2892/2011
NARENDER KUMAR & ORS ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Rajiv Kumar, Advocate
VERSUS
STATE & ANR ..... Respondents
CORAM:
Through: Manoj Ohri, APP for the State with SI
Sajjan Singh.
Respondent No.2 in person.
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
30.08.2011 Crl.
M.A. No. 10255/2011 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Crl. M.C. No. 2892/2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 228/2010 under Sections
498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS Narda, Delhi.
The Complainant/Respondent No. 2 Ms. Neetu is present in person and is identified by the Investigating Officer. She states that the Petitioners and Respondent No.2/Complainant have entered into a Compromise. In terms of the settlement, marriage between the Petitioner No. 1 and
Respondent No. 2/Complainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce by
Sajjan Singh.
Respondent No.2 in person.
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
30.08.2011 Crl.
M.A. No. 10255/2011 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Crl. M.C. No. 2892/2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 228/2010 under Sections
498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS Narda, Delhi.
The Complainant/Respondent No. 2 Ms. Neetu is present in person and is identified by the Investigating Officer. She states that the Petitioners and Respondent No.2/Complainant have entered into a Compromise. In terms of the settlement, marriage between the Petitioner No. 1 and
Respondent No. 2/Complainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce by
CRL.M.C. 2892/2011
~ --\ ·-,-! ~ -.,-~~ I -.-! L:~ _..
:',-~i '---'< I I ! ' 2011:DHC:9709 v mutual consent on 15th October, 2010. As full and final settlement of all the claims of the Respondent No.2, the Petitioner No. 1 has paid ~50,000/-. She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
Consequently, FIR No. 228/2010 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS Narela, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.
Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court.
The petition is disposed of. Order dasti.
- - A n~elv'\~ ~~\P" ~f1B- MUKTA GUPTA, J.
AUGUST 30, 2011/'vn' CRL.M.C. 289212011 Page 2 of2
: '::
--' I j··:
I
?Y~~o\~v "' ~or"'~ ~ t.)
¥-' ~r ,~~F D ,~ -">" ~ Y. - MA )pv- )
~'o/" .:W-7• I'D .,D! ,..,t.t4 y ,.)'-\. "" . '{..: c.J< •
~ ~1;·r~" t~~,..._\6'=> e-.~ ~PI"''""~ ,wY ~~
2011:DHC:9709
~ --\ ·-,-! ~ -.,-~~ I -.-! L:~ _..
:',-~i '---'< I I ! ' 2011:DHC:9709 v mutual consent on 15th October, 2010. As full and final settlement of all the claims of the Respondent No.2, the Petitioner No. 1 has paid ~50,000/-. She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
Consequently, FIR No. 228/2010 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS Narela, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.
Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court.
The petition is disposed of. Order dasti.
- - A n~elv'\~ ~~\P" ~f1B- MUKTA GUPTA, J.
AUGUST 30, 2011/'vn' CRL.M.C. 289212011 Page 2 of2
: '::
--' I j··:
I
?Y~~o\~v "' ~or"'~ ~ t.)
¥-' ~r ,~~F D ,~ -">" ~ Y. - MA )pv- )
~'o/" .:W-7• I'D .,D! ,..,t.t4 y ,.)'-\. "" . '{..: c.J< •
~ ~1;·r~" t~~,..._\6'=> e-.~ ~PI"''""~ ,wY ~~
2011:DHC:9709
JUDGMENT