Full Text
'< IN THE HIGH COURT
+ CRL.M.C.2736120rL
IMRAN KHAN & ORS.
Through
OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI..... Petitioner
:Mr. P.K. Agarwal, Adv.
VCTSUS
STATE & ANR. ..... ResPondent
Through :Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP.
Mr. Amit Gupta, Adv. for R-2.
CRL. M.A. 976212O11 (Exemptionl
Allowed subject to all just exceptions. cRL. M.C. 2736l20L1
ORDER
1. Vide FIR 609 dated 04.08.2006, a case under Sections 498A1406134 Indian Penal Code, 1860 was registered against the petitioner No.l, the husband of respondent No. 2 and against the petitioners No. 2 to 8, the relatives of petitioner No. 1 at P.S. Shakurpur.
2. The petitioner No.1 is the husband of the respondent No.2 and the petitioners No.2 to B are the relatives of petitioner No.1.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter has been settled between the pafties and the petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 are residing together again as husband and wife w.e.f. May, 2009. lt is submitted that they have blessed with a girl child, who is now I0 1/z months old. 2011:DHC:10712 1/
4. The respondent No.2/Ms. Fauzia Begam, is personally present in the court submits that she is residing with her husband w.e.f. May, 2009 and she has no objection if the aforesaid FIR is quashed.
5. Since the petitioner No.l and respondent No. 2 have reconciled their disputes and are living together happily as husband and wife w.e.f. May, 2009 and they have been blessed with a girl child, I quash the FIR 609/2006 registered under Sections 498A1406134 Indian Penal Code, 1860, PS Shakarpur and all the proceedings emanating therefrom.
6. Keeping in view the poor financial condition of the parties, I iefrain myself from imposing cost.
7. Crl. M.C 2736120LL is allowed and disposed of on the above terms.
8. Dasti.
SURESH KAIT, J AUGUST L[9], 2OL[1] j