Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL) 632/2011
INDER BAHADUR
Through
W.P.(CRL) 632/2011
INDER BAHADUR
Through
VERSUS
STATE
Through
Through
CORAM: ..... Petitioner Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Advocate ..... Respondent
Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Addl. Standing Counsel (Crl.)
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
19.08.2011 By this petition, the Petitioner seeks parole on the ground that he has to admit his children in good institution according to his present economic standard and to re-establish societal ties.
On a notice being issued, the Status :Report has been filed. As per the
Status Report, the petitioner has four children. His eldest daughter aged 17 years is studying B.Sc. 1st Year at Allahabad; Son Rohit is studying in
Intermediate College and two younger children Indu and Kim Rajvansh aged
13 and 11 years respectively are studying in school. The facts have been duly verified from the Principals of the Colleges and the Pradhan of the village. Moreover, the Petitioner was granted parole in March, 2011 and thus, I do not find any reason to grant parole to him at this stage.
The petition is dismissed. Copy of the order be communicated to the
Petitioner through the Superintendent, Tihar Jail.
~A~J AUGUST 19, 2011/'raj' 2011:DHC:16869
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
19.08.2011 By this petition, the Petitioner seeks parole on the ground that he has to admit his children in good institution according to his present economic standard and to re-establish societal ties.
On a notice being issued, the Status :Report has been filed. As per the
Status Report, the petitioner has four children. His eldest daughter aged 17 years is studying B.Sc. 1st Year at Allahabad; Son Rohit is studying in
Intermediate College and two younger children Indu and Kim Rajvansh aged
13 and 11 years respectively are studying in school. The facts have been duly verified from the Principals of the Colleges and the Pradhan of the village. Moreover, the Petitioner was granted parole in March, 2011 and thus, I do not find any reason to grant parole to him at this stage.
The petition is dismissed. Copy of the order be communicated to the
Petitioner through the Superintendent, Tihar Jail.
~A~J AUGUST 19, 2011/'raj' 2011:DHC:16869
JUDGMENT