Ramapandey v. Aruna Sharma

Delhi High Court · 30 Aug 2011 · 2011:DHC:8511
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw
CONT.CAS(C) 269/2011 with W.P. (C) No. 3624/2010
2011:DHC:8511
civil petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of a contempt petition as the respondent complied with the court order before proceedings could continue.

Full Text
Translation output
v r ~- HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CONT.CAS(C) 269/2011 with W.P. (C) No. 3624/2010
RAMAPANDEY
Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Nitin Mishra and Mr. Alok Mishra, Advs.
ARUNA SHARMA
Through
CORAM:
VERSUS
Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
30.08.2011 ..... Respondent Counsel for the respondent states that the order against which contempt was filed has since been complied with. Learned counsel for the petitioner confirms the same.
In the circumstances it is not deemed expedient to proceed further.
The petition is disposed of No order as to costs.
AUGUST 30, 2011 Sd ~-- 2011:DHC:8511
JUDGMENT