Gurdial Singh Chaina v. Manoranjan Sondhi

Supreme Court of India · 16 Jan 2009
Tarun Chatterjee; H. L. Dattu
TRANSFER PETITION (CRL.) NO.318 OF 2008
criminal appeal_allowed

AI Summary

The Supreme Court allowed the transfer of a complaint case from Uttar Pradesh to Delhi to be tried along with a related criminal case for judicial convenience and to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.

Full Text
Translation output
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
TRANSFER PETITION (CRL.) NO.318 OF 2008
GURDIAL SINGH CHAINA & ANR. .....PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
MANORANJAN SONDHI & ANR. .....RESPONDENT(S)
This is a petition for transfer of Complaint Case No.33/2008 titled Manoranjan
Sondhi vs.Nahar Singh and another, pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Mawana, Meerut, U.P. to the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate, Tees Hazari, Delhi for trial along with State Criminal
Case No.526/2/2003 titled State Vs.Manoranjan Sondhi & Others. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and after going through the averments made in the petition and considering the age of the petitioners, we are of the view that Complaint Case No.33/2008 titled Manoranjan
Sondhi vs.Nahar Singh and another, pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Mawana, Meerut, U.P. be transferred to the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate, Tees Hazari, Delhi for trial along with
State Criminal Case No.526/2/2003 titled State Vs.Manoranjan Sondhi & Others. We order accordingly. The Transfer Petition is allowed.
The records of the case be transmitted to the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate, Tees
Hazari, Delhi at an early date. ...................J.
( TARUN CHATTERJEE ) ...................J.
( H.L.DATTU )
NEW DELHI;
JANUARY 16, 2009.
JUDGMENT