Sanjay Kumar v. Union of India

Supreme Court of India · 20 Feb 2009
Tarun Chatterjee; H. L. Dattu
Writ Petition (Civil) No.411 of 2008
constitutional appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Supreme Court allowed withdrawal of a writ petition under Article 32 and directed the petitioner to approach the High Court under Article 226 for the same grievances.

Full Text
Translation output
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.411 OF 2008
SANJAY KUMAR .....PETITIONER (S)
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ....RESPONDENT(S)
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
This petition has been filed under Article 32 of the Constitution.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition. Permission as prayed for is granted. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
However, it will be open to the petitioner to move the High Court under Article 226 in respect of his grievances raised before this Court.
The questions of law raised by the petitioner in this petition can also be raised before the
High Court which can be contested by the State Forest Corporation. .............................J.
( TARUN CHATTERJEE ) .............................J.
( H.L.DATTU )
NEW DELHI;
FEBRUARY 20, 2009.
JUDGMENT