Full Text
Translation output
22# $- HIGH COURT OF DELHI CRL.REV.P. 64412008
JASPAL SINGH NARULA & ORS. ..... Petitioners
Through: \ilr. K.B. Andley, Sr. Advocate with
VIr. M.L. Yadav, Advocate.
VETSUS..... Respondent Mr. Mukesh Gupta, APP with SI
Yogesh Kumar, PS Geeta ColonY.
Mr. A.K. Tripathi, Advocate for Respondent No. 2.
JASPAL SINGH NARULA & ORS. ..... Petitioners
Through: \ilr. K.B. Andley, Sr. Advocate with
VIr. M.L. Yadav, Advocate.
VETSUS..... Respondent Mr. Mukesh Gupta, APP with SI
Yogesh Kumar, PS Geeta ColonY.
Mr. A.K. Tripathi, Advocate for Respondent No. 2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
ORDER oh 2.09.2011 By this petition the Petitioners have challenged the order framing charge under Sections 498N302134 IPC.
. Learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioners at the outset states that the
Petitioners are facing trial since 1994 and the trial is not progressing because one after another on petitions are being filed before this Court and during the pendency of the present petition also, the Trial Court record is being called repeatedly. He states that he would be satisfied, if this Court directs the learned Trial Court to now conclude the trial expeditiously.
Undoubtedly, since the Trial Court record has been repeatedly called before this Court, the trial could not be concluded and only four witnesses
STATE OF DELHI
Through:
2011:DHC:19618 ,@ have been examined till now.
In the interest of justice, the learned Trial Court is requested to expedite the trial and conclude the same preferably within six months.
The withdrawal of the present petition is without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the Petitioner who has not raised any contention on merit before this Court so as to get the trial expedited.
Petition is disposed of. Trial Court record be sent back forthwith.
[),-frL\"7U MUKTA GUPTA, J.
SEPTEMBER 02,2011 tvnt 2011:DHC:19618
ORDER oh 2.09.2011 By this petition the Petitioners have challenged the order framing charge under Sections 498N302134 IPC.
. Learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioners at the outset states that the
Petitioners are facing trial since 1994 and the trial is not progressing because one after another on petitions are being filed before this Court and during the pendency of the present petition also, the Trial Court record is being called repeatedly. He states that he would be satisfied, if this Court directs the learned Trial Court to now conclude the trial expeditiously.
Undoubtedly, since the Trial Court record has been repeatedly called before this Court, the trial could not be concluded and only four witnesses
STATE OF DELHI
Through:
2011:DHC:19618 ,@ have been examined till now.
In the interest of justice, the learned Trial Court is requested to expedite the trial and conclude the same preferably within six months.
The withdrawal of the present petition is without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the Petitioner who has not raised any contention on merit before this Court so as to get the trial expedited.
Petition is disposed of. Trial Court record be sent back forthwith.
[),-frL\"7U MUKTA GUPTA, J.
SEPTEMBER 02,2011 tvnt 2011:DHC:19618
JUDGMENT