Full Text
W.P.(C) 6185/2011
I
CHANDRA BHAN Petitioner
Through; l^lr.S.S.Pandey, Advocate
Through; Ms.Barkha Babbar, Advocate I
02.09.2011
ORDER
1. Learned counsel for the respondent has handed over to learned counsel for the petitioner a copy of the comments received by her. On perusing them, learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the proposed action which respondents contemplate and as finds a mention in para 8 and 9 of the communication to the learned counsel, petitioner be permitted to withdraw the writ petition.
2. We, note that in para 8 and 9 of the communication sent to'the learned counsel, the respondents have indicated that:- "8.' As the vacancies for the course mentioned in para 7(a) above were limited and these were already saturated by the applicants prior to the receipt of application in respect of petitioner, he could not be I • accommodated in the course. His case for W.P.(C) No. 6185/2011 Pase 1of 2 2011:DHC:18024-DB $ detailment on this course will be considered on merits against cancellation if any as the course is yet to start.
9. No detailment of any personnel of Army has been carried out as on date on the course mentioned at para 7(b) above. Name of JC-367929X Subedar Major Chander Bhan is part of the shortlisted candidates. His detailment most probably will be issued along with other candidates in first/second week of September 11, if not accommodated in detailment against cancellation as per para 8 above."
3. The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
4. No costs.
PRADEEP NANDRAJOGJ IIL GAUR,J SEPTEMBER 02,2011 pkb ' Page 2of[2]