Through Ms. Nandita Rao, Adv. for P-1 along withip-1 in person. P-2 iJn person. v. STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELID & ORS. .....

Delhi High Court · 02 Sep 2011 · 2011:DHC:16984
Stale with SI Manohar Lal, P.S.; Punjabi Bgh, and SI Ajay Kumar, P.S.; Haztat Nizamuddin.; Ms.:Manali Singhal, Adv. for R-4&5. i; HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUK'FA GUPTA i I
2011:DHC:16984
family appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners to withdraw their petition concerning a non-consummated marriage and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL) 1023/2011 o/o
VASUDHA GARG BANSAL & ANR. ..... Petitioner !
Through Ms. Nandita Rao, Adv. for P-1 along withip-1 in person.
P-2 iJn person.
VERSUS
STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELID & ORS. ..... Respondent
!
CORAM:
Through Mr. •Harsh Prabhakar, Adv. for Mr. Paw~m Sharma, Standing Counsel for
Stale with SI Manohar Lal, P.S.
Punjabi Bgh, and SI Ajay Kumar, P.S.
Haztat Nizamuddin.
Ms.:Manali Singhal, Adv. for R-4&5. i
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUK'FA GUPTA i I
02.09.20]j1 Crl.M.A. 10001/2011 By this application learned counsel for the Petitioner No.1 seeks withdrawal ofthe petition. Application st~nds allowed.
W.P.(CRL) 1023/2011
The Petitioners who are present in !court state that they could not get along as the marriage was not consummated and they undertake. to seek annulment of their marriage. Petitioner No.1 has rejoined her parents.
W.P.(CRL) 102312011 page I of 2 2011:DHC:16984
I
Petitioner No.1 further states that on joining !her parents i.e. Respondent NO. 4 & 5 she had lodged a complaint with P lS. Hazrat Nizamuddin on 17th august, 2011 and she will not pursue the saiq complaint.
In view of the subsequent events as :~he present petition has become infructuous and the Petitioners seek leave to/ withdraw the present petition.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn SEPTEMBER 02, 2011
'ga' W.P.(CRL) 102312011 ~~ MUKTA GUPTA,J page 2 of2
2011:DHC:16984
JUDGMENT