Iqbaal Ahmad v. State (NCT Delhi) and Ors.

Delhi High Court · 02 Sep 2011 · 2011:DHC:16977
Mukta Gupta
W.P.(CRL) 927/2011
2011:DHC:16977
criminal petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition as not pressed after the State assured registration of an FIR and legal action regarding the petitioner's grievous injury.

Full Text
Translation output
\
28# $-
* IN THE HIGH CQURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ w.P.(cRL) 92712011
IQBAAL AHMAD ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Suman Chauhan and Mr. Jivesh
Tiwari, Advocates.
VETSUS
STATE (NCT DELHI) AND ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Kr. Vijayendra, Advocate for Mr. Saleem Ahmed, Additional Standing
Counsel with Inspector Vijender
Singh, New Seelam Pur.
I\ft. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate for
Respondent Nos. 2 to 4.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
02.09.2011
Learned proxy counsel for the State on instructions from Inspector
Vijender Singh, PS New Seelam Pur, Delhi states that since an information has been received regarding grievous injrrry to the Petitioner they would register an FIR and proceed in accordance with law.
In view of the statement of the learned counsel for the State, learned counsel for the Petitioner does not want to press the present petition any further.
Petition is dismissed as not pressed. fi^&Lre-
" MUKTA GUPTA. J.
SEPTEMBER 02. 20llfvn' o
2011:DHC:16977
JUDGMENT