Through:Mr.N.N.Sarvariya, advocate alongwith plaintiffs in person v. VIJAY KUMAR KOCHHAR &ORS Defendant

Delhi High Court · 02 Sep 2011 · 2011:DHC:15216
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL; 02.09.2011 lA no.10141/2011
2011:DHC:15216
civil appeal_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed plaintiffs to withdraw their suit following settlement of all claims and directed refund of court fees under Section 16 of the Court Fee Act.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CS(OS) 1576/2011
S AMARJIT SINGH &ANR Plaintiff
Through:Mr.N.N.Sarvariya, advocate alongwith plaintiffs in person.
VERSUS
VIJAY KUMAR KOCHHAR &ORS Defendant
Through:Nenno.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL
02.09.2011 lA no.10141/2011
ORDER

1. Statement of plaintiff no.l has been recorded today.

2. Shri Vijay Kumar Kochhar, defendant no.l is also present in person. He has brought his driving licence as proof of his identity. The same has been scrutinized and returned.

3. In view of the statements of the plaintiffs and the agreement placed in this application, it would appear that all claims of the plaintiffs have been sati.sfied in terms of the settlement. No issue, therefore, survives for adjudication in the present case.

4. The plaintiffs have also stated that they have no right, title and interest in the suit property nor any surviving claim under the agreement to sell dated 2""^ August, 2010. 2011:DHC:15216 %: 2:

5. Leave is souglit on behalf of the plaintiffs who are present in court to withdraw the present case. Leave granted. lA no.10141/2011 is consequently allowed. CS(OS) no.1576/2011

6. In view of the orders passed on lA no.10141/2011, the suit is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.

7. The settlement has been arrived at on the very first date after its listing. The Registry is directed to issue a certificate in the prescribed format to enable the plaintiffs to obtain refund of the court fee in accordance with Section 16 of the Court Fee Act. GITA MITTAL;^ SEPTEMBER 02, 2011 / rds If