Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 1831/2011
SANJAY P Petitioner
Through Ms. Namita Roy, Advocate with Petitioner in person.
CRL.M.C. 1831/2011
SANJAY P Petitioner
Through Ms. Namita Roy, Advocate with Petitioner in person.
VERSUS
STATE & ANOTHER Respondent
Through Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for the State with S.I. Ramwati, PS Dwarka and
Respondent No. 2 in person.
Through Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for the State with S.I. Ramwati, PS Dwarka and
Respondent No. 2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
02.09.2011 Crl.
M.A. No. 9402/2011 By this application, the Petitioner seeks to implead the other accused as Petitioner in the present petition.
Application is allowed. Amended memo of parties is taken on record.
Application stands disposed of
02.09.2011 Crl.
M.A. No. 9402/2011 By this application, the Petitioner seeks to implead the other accused as Petitioner in the present petition.
Application is allowed. Amended memo of parties is taken on record.
Application stands disposed of
CRL.M.C. 1831/2011
This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 233/2009 under Sections
498A/406 IPG registered at PS Dwarka, New Delhi.
"A 2011:DHC:9792 The complainant/Respondent No. 2 Ms. Sivi Sasidharan is present in person and is identified by the investigating officer. The Petitioner is identified by his counsel. Complainant states that the Petitioner and
Respondent No.2/Complainant have entered into a Compromise. In terms of the settlement, marriage between the Petitioner No. 1 and
Respondent No. 2/complainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent on 24'^ May, 2011. As part of full and final settlement of all the claims of the Respondent No. 2, the Petitioner has paid ^7 lakhs out of which lakhs have already been paid to her and remaining lakhs have been paid in Court today in the form of a
Bankers Cheque No. "793954" drawn on State Bank of India, Dilshad
Garden Branch, Delhi. She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned
FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved tKeir differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
Consequently, FIR No. 233 under Sections 498A/406 IPC registered at PS Dwarka, New Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.
Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court.
The petition is disposed of. Order dasti.
SEPTEMBER 02, 2011 'dk' c MUKTA GUPTA,J
™ U .o»r
T-
This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 233/2009 under Sections
498A/406 IPG registered at PS Dwarka, New Delhi.
"A 2011:DHC:9792 The complainant/Respondent No. 2 Ms. Sivi Sasidharan is present in person and is identified by the investigating officer. The Petitioner is identified by his counsel. Complainant states that the Petitioner and
Respondent No.2/Complainant have entered into a Compromise. In terms of the settlement, marriage between the Petitioner No. 1 and
Respondent No. 2/complainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent on 24'^ May, 2011. As part of full and final settlement of all the claims of the Respondent No. 2, the Petitioner has paid ^7 lakhs out of which lakhs have already been paid to her and remaining lakhs have been paid in Court today in the form of a
Bankers Cheque No. "793954" drawn on State Bank of India, Dilshad
Garden Branch, Delhi. She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned
FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved tKeir differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
Consequently, FIR No. 233 under Sections 498A/406 IPC registered at PS Dwarka, New Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.
Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court.
The petition is disposed of. Order dasti.
SEPTEMBER 02, 2011 'dk' c MUKTA GUPTA,J
™ U .o»r
T-
JUDGMENT