Full Text
Translation output
I
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
ARB.P. 138/2010
SHAKUNTALA RATHI
Through
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
ARB.P. 138/2010
SHAKUNTALA RATHI
Through
VERSUS
..... Petitioner Mr. Vikas Goyal, Adv.
MIS WIRELESS TT INFO SERVICES LTD ..... Respondent
Through Mr. Shailesh K. Kapoor, Adv.
MIS WIRELESS TT INFO SERVICES LTD ..... Respondent
Through Mr. Shailesh K. Kapoor, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH
05.09.2011 The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 11 of the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment. of an arbitrator and reference of disputes between the parties. No reply to the petition has been filed. However, the learned counsel for the respondent submits that the respondent has no objection ifthe matter is referred to the sole arbitrator. As agreed, this matter is referred to the sole arbitrator who will decide in
- accordance with law. The matter is accordingly sent to the Delhi High Court
Arbitration Centre for the purpose. The fee ofthe arbitrator shall be fixed as
1"' per the schedule maintained by the Centre. Before the first sitting, notice shall be issued to the parties by the arbitrator.
The petition is disposed of.
SEPTEMBER 05, 2011 WI 8 I It I W 8 W f I I I It 8 W I !I
2011:DHC:6965
05.09.2011 The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 11 of the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment. of an arbitrator and reference of disputes between the parties. No reply to the petition has been filed. However, the learned counsel for the respondent submits that the respondent has no objection ifthe matter is referred to the sole arbitrator. As agreed, this matter is referred to the sole arbitrator who will decide in
- accordance with law. The matter is accordingly sent to the Delhi High Court
Arbitration Centre for the purpose. The fee ofthe arbitrator shall be fixed as
1"' per the schedule maintained by the Centre. Before the first sitting, notice shall be issued to the parties by the arbitrator.
The petition is disposed of.
SEPTEMBER 05, 2011 WI 8 I It I W 8 W f I I I It 8 W I !I
2011:DHC:6965
JUDGMENT