Full Text
Translation output
I t'tv 7)/
$-
* IN THE HIGH COT]RT w.P.(cRL) es6l20tr
'UNIL
KUMAR rhrough
VETSUS
STATE OF THE NCT OF DELHI
OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI..... Petitioner
Ms. Anita Abraham. Advocate ..... Respondent
Through Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, proxy counsel for Mr. Pawan Sharma with S.I.
Rajesh Kumar, PS Bhajanpura.
* IN THE HIGH COT]RT w.P.(cRL) es6l20tr
'UNIL
KUMAR rhrough
VETSUS
STATE OF THE NCT OF DELHI
OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI..... Petitioner
Ms. Anita Abraham. Advocate ..... Respondent
Through Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, proxy counsel for Mr. Pawan Sharma with S.I.
Rajesh Kumar, PS Bhajanpura.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA o/o 06.09.2011
By this petition, the Petitioner seeks parole on the ground that he has to file a Special Leave Petition in the hon'ble Supreme Court and to re- establish social ties.
On a notice being issued, a status report has been filed by the State.
As per the status report, the Petitioner has three married brothers out of which two are living with his mother though one is living separately. The brothers of the Petitioner are doing private services.
The brothers of the Petitioner are competent to filed special leave petition before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Moreover, the special leave petition can also be filed by the Petitioner or through jail. Further as regards
2011:DHC:17049 t1
) i+?
.' tence prayer fer re-establish social ties, the Petitioner has been awarded a sen of imprisonment for a period of ten years out of which he has already undergone more than 9 years and 10 months.
In view of the fact that only nearly one month of the sentence and payment of fine and in case of non-payment of fine, in default sentence has to be undergone, I find no reason to grant parole to the Petitioner.
Petition is dismissed.
Copy of this order be communicated to the Petitioner through
Superintendent, Tihar Jail. wtu@-
' MUKTA GUPTAOJ
SEPTEMBER 06,2011
'dk'
2011:DHC:17049
By this petition, the Petitioner seeks parole on the ground that he has to file a Special Leave Petition in the hon'ble Supreme Court and to re- establish social ties.
On a notice being issued, a status report has been filed by the State.
As per the status report, the Petitioner has three married brothers out of which two are living with his mother though one is living separately. The brothers of the Petitioner are doing private services.
The brothers of the Petitioner are competent to filed special leave petition before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Moreover, the special leave petition can also be filed by the Petitioner or through jail. Further as regards
2011:DHC:17049 t1
) i+?
.' tence prayer fer re-establish social ties, the Petitioner has been awarded a sen of imprisonment for a period of ten years out of which he has already undergone more than 9 years and 10 months.
In view of the fact that only nearly one month of the sentence and payment of fine and in case of non-payment of fine, in default sentence has to be undergone, I find no reason to grant parole to the Petitioner.
Petition is dismissed.
Copy of this order be communicated to the Petitioner through
Superintendent, Tihar Jail. wtu@-
' MUKTA GUPTAOJ
SEPTEMBER 06,2011
'dk'
2011:DHC:17049
JUDGMENT