Full Text
Translation output
A-40
% 15.9.2011
Present: Mr.Yogender Vashist, Advocate for the petitioner.
+CM(M) No.1073/2011
*
This petition has impugned the order of the Additional Rent
Controller (ARC); the eviction petition filed before the ARC was an eviction petition under Section 14(l)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control
Act (hereinafter referred to as "the DRCA"). The complete procedure dealing with the proceedings under Section 14(l)(e) of the DRCA is contained in the Section 25(B) of the DRCA. Since the efficacious remedy under Section 25(B)(8) of the DRCA was available to the petitioner this petition is not maintainable.
Dismissed with liberty to approach approprjfete legal forum through appropriate legal remedy.
INDERMEET KAUR, J.
SEPTEMBER 15, 2011 nandan
2011:DHC:19484
% 15.9.2011
Present: Mr.Yogender Vashist, Advocate for the petitioner.
+CM(M) No.1073/2011
*
This petition has impugned the order of the Additional Rent
Controller (ARC); the eviction petition filed before the ARC was an eviction petition under Section 14(l)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control
Act (hereinafter referred to as "the DRCA"). The complete procedure dealing with the proceedings under Section 14(l)(e) of the DRCA is contained in the Section 25(B) of the DRCA. Since the efficacious remedy under Section 25(B)(8) of the DRCA was available to the petitioner this petition is not maintainable.
Dismissed with liberty to approach approprjfete legal forum through appropriate legal remedy.
INDERMEET KAUR, J.
SEPTEMBER 15, 2011 nandan
2011:DHC:19484
JUDGMENT