ab5103bb367827ea6e74e51573ecdf470aebe251c2a09ad7aee0892d13eb2035

Delhi High Court · 12 Sep 2011 · 2011:DHC:8371
Indernteet Kaur
CONT. CAS (C) No.69/201-O
2011:DHC:8371
civil petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The court dismissed the petition as infructuous since the arbitration award was challenged separately, rendering interim relief during arbitration proceedings ineffective.

Full Text
Translation output
B
A-25 o/o L2.9.20tL
Present : Mr.Arvind Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.Sandeep Sharma, Advocate for the respondent.
+CONT. CAS (C) No.69/201-O t<
Learned counsel for the respondent states that the order dated
15.4.2009 has not in any manner been violated; during the pendency of the arbitration proceedings he had not used the trade name "Popular
Traders" in any manner; it is further pointed out that the arbitration proceed.ings had since been culminated and the Award had been
pronounced on 01.10.2010. The relief claimed which is a part of the
order dated L5.+.2009 which inter alia reads as:
"The respondent during pendency of the arbitration proceedings shall not carry on trade in the name and style of "Popular Traders" and shall not operate the bank account No.CA/01/200191 with
Corporation Bank, GTB Enclave, Nutun Vidhya Mandir, Delh-93 and bank account No.1256L with Punjab National Bank, Raghuganj, Chawri Bazar, Delhi. has not been granted in favour of the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the Award has since been challenged and is the subject matter of separate independent proceeding; in this view of the matter this petition does not survive; it has become infructuous; it is disposed off accordingly.
INDERNTEET KAUR, J.
SEPTEMBER T2,?OTL nandan
{
2011:DHC:8371
JUDGMENT