Indcap Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. & Ors v. Regional Director, Northern Region & Ors

Delhi High Court · 12 Sep 2011 · 2011:DHC:7658
Manmohan
Co.Pet. 106/2011
2011:DHC:7658
corporate petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, after finding all procedural requirements complied with and no objections raised.

Full Text
Translation output
$ HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CO.PET. 106/2011
IN THE MATTER OF INDCAP FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT. LTD. & ORS Petitioners
Through: Mr. Rajeev K. Goel, Advocate for Petitioner Companies.
Mr. Mayank Goel, Advocate for Official Liquidator with Mr. S.B. Gautam, Official Liquidator.
Mr. K.S. Pradhan, Deputy Registrar of Companies for Regional Director
(Northern Region).
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
12.09.2011
ORDER

1. This second motion joint petition has been filed under Sections 391(2) & 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short 'Scheme') seeking sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation (for short 'Scheme') of Indcap Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. (Transferor Company No.1), Pushp Properties Pvt. Ltd. (Transferor Company No.2) and Pushp Equity Pvt. Ltd. (Transferor Co. Pet. 106 of 2011 Page 1 of[6] 2011:DHC:7658 Company No.3) with Indcap Leasing and Finance Pvt. Ltd. (Transferee Company). The registered offices of the Petitioner Companies are situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this Court. Details with regard to the date of incorporation of Transferor and Transferee Companies, their authorized, issued, subscribed and paid up capital have been given in the Petition. Copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association.as well as the latest audited Annual Accounts for the year ended 31 S March, 2010 of the Petitioner Companies have also been enclosed with the Petition. Copies of the Resolutions passed by the Board of Directors of the Petitioner Companies approving the Scheme have also been placed on record. It has been submitted that no proceeding under Sections 235 to 251 of the Act is pending against the Petitioner Companies. Co. Pet. 106 of2011 Page2of[6] Li

7. The Petitioner Companies had earlier filed CA (M) No. 33 of 2011 seeking directions of this Court for dispensation of meetings. Vide order dated 18th February, 2011, this Court allowed the Application and dispensed with the requirement of convening meetings of Shareholders and Creditors of the Transferor Companies and of the Transferee Company under the supervision of the Court..8. The Petitioner. Companies have thereafter filed the present petition seeking sanction of the Scheme. Vide order dated 4th March, 2011, notice in the petition was directed to be issued to the Regional Director, Northern Region and the Official Liquidator. Citations were also directed to be published in 'Statesman' (English, Delhi Edition) and 'Veer Arjun' (Hindi, Delhi Edition). Affidavit of service and publication has been filed by the Petitioners showing compliance regarding service of the petition on the Regional Director, Northern Region and the Official Liquidator, and also regarding publication of citations in the aforesaid newspapers on 18th May,

2011. Copies of the newspapers' cuttings, in original, containing the publications have been filed along with the affidavit of service. Co.Pet. 106of2011 Page3of[6] Pursuant to the notices issued, the Official Liquidator sought information from the Petitioner Companies. Based on the information received, the Official Liquidator has filed his report dated, 27th May, 2011, wherein he has stated that he has not received any complaint against the proposed Scheme from any person/party interested in the Scheme in any manner and that the affairs of the Transferor Companies No. 1 to 3 do not appear to have been conducted in a manner prejudicial to the interest of its members, creditors or to public interest. In response to the notices issued in the Petition, Mr. B. K. Bansal, Regional Director, Northern Region, Ministry of Corporate Affairs has filed his Affidavit/Report dated 29th April, 2011. Relying on Clause 7 of the - Scheme, he has stated that all the employees of the Transferor Companies No. 1 to 3 shall become the employees of the Transferee Company without any break or interruption in their services upon sanctioning of the Scheme by this Court. No objection has been received to the Scheme from any other party. An affidavit dated 8th September, 2011 has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner Transferee Company confirming that neither the Petitioner Co. Pet. 106 of 2011 Page4of[6] Companies nor their counsel has received any objection pursuant to citations published in the newspapers. Even today, during the course of hearing, Mr. Mayank Goel, learned counsel for Official Liquidator and Mr. K.S. Pradhan, Deputy Registrar of Companies for Regional Director (Northern Region) state that they have no objection to the present Scheme being sanctioned. In view of the approval accorded by the Shareholders and Creditors of the Petitioner Companies; representationlreports filed by the Regional Director, Northern Region and the Official Liquidator, attached with this Court to the proposed Scheme, there appears to be no impediment to the grant of sanction to the Scheme. Consequently, sanction is hereby granted to the Scheme under Sections 391 and 394 of the Act. The Petitioner Companies will comply with the statutory requirements in accordance with law. Certified copy of the formal order be filed with the Registrar of Companies within 30 days from the date of receipt of the same. In terms of the provisions of Sections 391 and 394 of the Act, all the property, rights and powers of the Transferor Companies No.1 to 3 be transferred to and vest in the Transferee Company without any further act or deed. Similarly, all (0 Co.Pet. 106of2011 Page5of[6] the liabilities and duties of the Transferor Companies No. 1 to 3 be transferred to the Transferee Company without any further act or deed. Upon the Scheme coming into effect, the Transferor Companies shall stand dissolved without winding up. It is, however, clarified that this order will not be construed as an order granting exemption from payment of stamp duty or any other charges, if payable, in accordance with any law; or permissionlcompliance with any other requirement which may be specifically required under any law. Mr.. Rajeev Goel, learned counsel states that the Petitioner Companies would voluntarily deposit a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with the Common Pool fund of the Official Liquidator within three weeks from today. The said statement is accepted. The Petition is allowed in the above terms. Order dasti. L1L MANMOHAN7J SEPTEMBER 12, 2011 is I Co. Pet. 106 of 2011 Page6of[6]