Full Text
Translation output
s-47 HIGH COURT OF DELHI CRL.M.C .309612011 RAJKUMAR MEHTA & ORS. ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Gurmit Singh Hans, Adv. with petitioners in person.
Through Mr. Gurmit Singh Hans, Adv. with petitioners in person.
VERSUS
STATE & ANR ResPondent
Through Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for State with SI Balwan Singh, P.S. Shahdara.
Ms. Vandana Bhatia, Adv. For R-2 with R-2 in person.
Through Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for State with SI Balwan Singh, P.S. Shahdara.
Ms. Vandana Bhatia, Adv. For R-2 with R-2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
16.09.2011 Cr1.M.A. 10971/2011 Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions.
16.09.2011 Cr1.M.A. 10971/2011 Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions.
CRL.M.C. 3096/2011 & Cr1.M.A. 10970/2011 (stay)
This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 69412006 under Sections
498N406134TPC registered at PS Hari Nagar, Delhi.
The complainant/Respondent No. 2 Ms. Sunita Mehta is present in person and is identified by her counsel and Investigating Officer. She states that the Petitioners and Respondent No.2/Complainant have entered into a
CRL.M.C.30\6/2011 o/o 2011:DHC:12607 ()/ Compromise. In terms of the settlement, marriage betwqen the Petitioner NO. 1 and Respondent No. 2lcomplainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent on 27th July, 20lL As part of full and final settlement of all the claims of the Respondent No. 2,the Petitioner No. t has paid Rs. 90,000/- out of which Rs. 51,000/- have already been paid to her and the remaining amount is lying deposited with the learned Additional
District Judge. She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create fuither acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
Consequently, FIR No. 69412006 under Sections 498N406134 IPC registered at PS Hari Nagar, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.
The Respondent/complainant will be entitled to receive the remaining
This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 69412006 under Sections
498N406134TPC registered at PS Hari Nagar, Delhi.
The complainant/Respondent No. 2 Ms. Sunita Mehta is present in person and is identified by her counsel and Investigating Officer. She states that the Petitioners and Respondent No.2/Complainant have entered into a
CRL.M.C.30\6/2011 o/o 2011:DHC:12607 ()/ Compromise. In terms of the settlement, marriage betwqen the Petitioner NO. 1 and Respondent No. 2lcomplainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent on 27th July, 20lL As part of full and final settlement of all the claims of the Respondent No. 2,the Petitioner No. t has paid Rs. 90,000/- out of which Rs. 51,000/- have already been paid to her and the remaining amount is lying deposited with the learned Additional
District Judge. She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create fuither acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
Consequently, FIR No. 69412006 under Sections 498N406134 IPC registered at PS Hari Nagar, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.
The Respondent/complainant will be entitled to receive the remaining
CRL.M.C. 3096/2011 v amount along with the interest that may have accrued thereon lying before the learned Additional District Judge.
Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court
The petition and the pending application are disposed of. Order dasti. lhr,"Y,6-fu'fL
'MUKTA GUPTA,J SEPTEMBER 16,201.L 'gu' I r Qqr X.n
- n- M+h k< 2 . g*\t ols \ c\ o-n o{*u T {\oi.t'i^ K.^.......ru
A.*us("t"S q;!rkt\'*1 N - 4;x\4, r;
Ijk ytj .aM '*ry\\ p{t vw
Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court
The petition and the pending application are disposed of. Order dasti. lhr,"Y,6-fu'fL
'MUKTA GUPTA,J SEPTEMBER 16,201.L 'gu' I r Qqr X.n
- n- M+h k< 2 . g*\t ols \ c\ o-n o{*u T {\oi.t'i^ K.^.......ru
A.*us("t"S q;!rkt\'*1 N - 4;x\4, r;
Ijk ytj .aM '*ry\\ p{t vw
CRL.M.C. 3096/2011
-9 tJp^14! w-G-"Iil"^A gr^L\ S,o "-Pft"'1fifr fu noo -'xtroc4'q
-9 tJp^14! w-G-"Iil"^A gr^L\ S,o "-Pft"'1fifr fu noo -'xtroc4'q
JUDGMENT