Full Text
Translation output
/V
A-20
% 13.09.2011
Present: None for the petitioners.
Mr. Rakesh Mittal, Advocate for the respondent.
+CONT. CAS (C) No. 469/2007
*
Comphance affidavit of the respondent is on record; it specifically states that the directions contained in the order dated
13.10.2006 have been complied with; the respondent has been directed to re-fix the seniority of the petitioners after taking into account their length of service w.e.f. 19.10.1987 as Train Examiner with consequential pensionary benefits. In para 7 of the compliance affidavit, it has been stated that the petitioners have been assigned seniority from the date of their ad-hoc promotion i.e.
19.10.1987 and accorded promotion at par with their claimed juniors namely A.K. Chopra and Balbir Singh as originally prayed for-by_them in O.A. No.47/97. In the reply of the contempt petition, it has been stated that only one petitioner Meharban Singh was due for payment of arrears; the amount of Rs.17,136/- has since been paid; other two petitioners namely Rameshwar Dayal and
Sohan Lai had already drawn overdue payment.
In this view of the matter, nothing survives in this petition which is disposed of accordingly.
SEPTEMBER 13, 2011
INDERMEET KAUR, J. a cl
2011:DHC:9604
A-20
% 13.09.2011
Present: None for the petitioners.
Mr. Rakesh Mittal, Advocate for the respondent.
+CONT. CAS (C) No. 469/2007
*
Comphance affidavit of the respondent is on record; it specifically states that the directions contained in the order dated
13.10.2006 have been complied with; the respondent has been directed to re-fix the seniority of the petitioners after taking into account their length of service w.e.f. 19.10.1987 as Train Examiner with consequential pensionary benefits. In para 7 of the compliance affidavit, it has been stated that the petitioners have been assigned seniority from the date of their ad-hoc promotion i.e.
19.10.1987 and accorded promotion at par with their claimed juniors namely A.K. Chopra and Balbir Singh as originally prayed for-by_them in O.A. No.47/97. In the reply of the contempt petition, it has been stated that only one petitioner Meharban Singh was due for payment of arrears; the amount of Rs.17,136/- has since been paid; other two petitioners namely Rameshwar Dayal and
Sohan Lai had already drawn overdue payment.
In this view of the matter, nothing survives in this petition which is disposed of accordingly.
SEPTEMBER 13, 2011
INDERMEET KAUR, J. a cl
2011:DHC:9604
JUDGMENT