Full Text
Translation output
: t-15
16.09.2011
Present: Mr. S.K.Sethi, Counsel for the petitioner'
Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, Addl, Standing Counsel (Crl') &
Ms. Urvi Kuthiala, Advocate for respondent-State with Sl SandeeP Panwar.
Petitioner- Pankaj Kumar was awarded substantive sentence of 2 years for the offence under Section 465 of the lndian Penal Code and he was further sentenced to rigorous imprisonment of 3 years for the offence under Section 420 of the lndian Penal Code by the trial court in case FIR No.2411997, registered at police station Greater Kailash-1, New Delhi, which was unsuccessfully challenged in the appeal.
Nominal roll of the petitioner reflects that the petitioner has already undergone the sentence awarded. lt is stated that this revision petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, this revision petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.
_a--
- Sunil Gaur, J
September 16, 2OII rS
2011:DHC:19640
16.09.2011
Present: Mr. S.K.Sethi, Counsel for the petitioner'
Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, Addl, Standing Counsel (Crl') &
Ms. Urvi Kuthiala, Advocate for respondent-State with Sl SandeeP Panwar.
Petitioner- Pankaj Kumar was awarded substantive sentence of 2 years for the offence under Section 465 of the lndian Penal Code and he was further sentenced to rigorous imprisonment of 3 years for the offence under Section 420 of the lndian Penal Code by the trial court in case FIR No.2411997, registered at police station Greater Kailash-1, New Delhi, which was unsuccessfully challenged in the appeal.
Nominal roll of the petitioner reflects that the petitioner has already undergone the sentence awarded. lt is stated that this revision petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, this revision petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.
_a--
- Sunil Gaur, J
September 16, 2OII rS
2011:DHC:19640
JUDGMENT