Itavinder Kumar v. State & Ors

Delhi High Court · 16 Sep 2011 · 2011:DHC:18109
Mukta Gupta
W.P.(CRL) 1062/2011
2011:DHC:18109
criminal petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The High Court dismissed the petition as not pressed after the respondent withdrew objection to the marriage and refused to pursue the missing report.

Full Text
Translation output
27# S-
*INTHEHIGHCOURToFDELHIATNEwDELHI w.P.(cRL) r062t20rr
ITAVINDER KUMAR & AM{ ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Pradeep Chauhan, Advocate with
Petitioners in Person.
VETSUS
STATE & ORS
CORAM:
..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for Mr. Pawan
Sharma, Standing Counsel for the
State with SI Asha Ram, PS Gandhi
Nagar.
Respondent No. 4 in Person. oh
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
L6.09.2011
Respondent No. 4 is present in Court. He states that the Petitioner NO. 2 has rnaried Petitioner No. 1 of her own free will and he has no objection thereof as Petitioner No. 2 rs a major. He also states that he will not pursue the missing report lodged by hirn at PS Loni, Uttar Pradesh.
In view of the statement of Respondent No. 4, learned counsel for the
Petitioners, on instructions from the Petitioners, who are present in Court, states that he does not want to press the present petition.
Petition is dismissed as not pressed.
'l\rr"*fr-4"f@-
'MUKTA GUPTA. J.
SEPTEMBER 16,20II tvnt
2011:DHC:18109
JUDGMENT