Haji Mohd Saeed v. Mohd Din & Anr

Delhi High Court · 16 Sep 2011 · 2011:DHC:16105
P.K. Bhasin
2011:DHC:16105
civil other

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court granted tenants six months to vacate premises after an oral undertaking, disposing of the petition as not pressed.

Full Text
Translation output
l2 o (-2 HIGH COURT OF DELHI ITC.REV. 349I2OII
AT NEW DEI,HI IIAJI MOHD SAEED DECD TI{R LI{S ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Anis Ahmed, Advocate with Mohd' Sultan, petitioner no. 8-General Attorney.
VETSLTS
MOHD DIN & ANR ..... ResPondents
Through: Mr. S.S. Dhingra, Advocate with R-l in pel'sol1.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. BHASIN ORDX]R 16.09.2011
Today counsel for the petitioners on instructions from petitioner No.8, who is present in Court and claims himself to be the General Attorney of his co-petitioners says that six rnonlhs' time may be given to the petitioners to vacate the tenanted premises.
Learnecl counsel for the respondents on instructions fi'om respondent No.1 Mohd.
Din rvho is also present in Court is agleeable for grant of six months' time to the petitioners-tenants to vacate the tenanted prernises considering the fact that they have been in possession of the ploperties since 1950. The General Attomey of the petitioners gives an oral undefiaking to the Court to vacate the property within six months and hand over its possession to the respondents-landlords. This undertaking is accepted. This petitiol is now disposed of as not pressed but the petitioners are^ granted time of six rnonths frorn today to vacate the tenanted premises.
SEPTEMBEII. 16, 2011 nk Y t 2011:DHC:16105
JUDGMENT