Full Text
Translation output
{ / $-36 IN TI{E HIGH COURT OF DELIII AT NEW DEI,HI w.P.(cRL) I4sl20II
PAWAN@JITENDER.....Petitioner
Through IW. Neeraj Bhardwaj, Adv' VETSUS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ""' Respondent
Through \4r. Saleem Ahmed, ASC for State with SI Hukarn Singh, PS Seernapuri.
PAWAN@JITENDER.....Petitioner
Through IW. Neeraj Bhardwaj, Adv' VETSUS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ""' Respondent
Through \4r. Saleem Ahmed, ASC for State with SI Hukarn Singh, PS Seernapuri.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
19.09.2011 By this petition the Petitioner seeks parole on the ground that he has to re-establish ties and file the SLP. On notice being issued a verification was conducted. As per the verification, the address given by the Petitioner is of the house of the rnother-in-law of his brother. oh
-f Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that Petitioner is in custody for last 11 years and after the death of his mother, his brother started living with his rnother--in-law. The Petitioner if released will live with his brother at his brother's mother-in-law's house.
19.09.2011 By this petition the Petitioner seeks parole on the ground that he has to re-establish ties and file the SLP. On notice being issued a verification was conducted. As per the verification, the address given by the Petitioner is of the house of the rnother-in-law of his brother. oh
-f Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that Petitioner is in custody for last 11 years and after the death of his mother, his brother started living with his rnother--in-law. The Petitioner if released will live with his brother at his brother's mother-in-law's house.
W.P.(CRL) 145/2011 Page I of 2
2011:DHC:18048 "?+ In view of the fact that the Petitioner's brother is living at the said address, I am inclined to grant parole to the Petitioner. It is therefore directed that the Petitioner be released on parole for a period of four weeks on his fumishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with t'wo sureties of the like amount subject to the satisfaction of the Learned Trial
Couril CMM. It is clarified that one surety would be the brother of the
Petitioner.
Petition is disposed of. Order dasti.
SEPTEMBER 19,2011 'gu' w.P.(cRL) 14s/2011 Jlwm fi:ro E'en'-q-
U
-- page 2 of2 p^^Jh./'^fL "MUKTa. GTIPTA,J fua"Ottp f'>r,y,nf
-16 ururi*lr*phb& oh 64# S- HIGH COURT OF DELHI w.P.(cRL) r4sl20rr
PAWAN @JITENDER ..... Petitioner
Through: None.
VETSUS
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Puneet Relan, Advocate for Mr. Saleem Ahmed, Additional Standing
Counsel with SI Ranjeet Singh.
2011:DHC:18048 "?+ In view of the fact that the Petitioner's brother is living at the said address, I am inclined to grant parole to the Petitioner. It is therefore directed that the Petitioner be released on parole for a period of four weeks on his fumishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with t'wo sureties of the like amount subject to the satisfaction of the Learned Trial
Couril CMM. It is clarified that one surety would be the brother of the
Petitioner.
Petition is disposed of. Order dasti.
SEPTEMBER 19,2011 'gu' w.P.(cRL) 14s/2011 Jlwm fi:ro E'en'-q-
U
-- page 2 of2 p^^Jh./'^fL "MUKTa. GTIPTA,J fua"Ottp f'>r,y,nf
-16 ururi*lr*phb& oh 64# S- HIGH COURT OF DELHI w.P.(cRL) r4sl20rr
PAWAN @JITENDER ..... Petitioner
Through: None.
VETSUS
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Puneet Relan, Advocate for Mr. Saleem Ahmed, Additional Standing
Counsel with SI Ranjeet Singh.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
23.01.2012 Crl.
M.A. No. 9L8/20L2 (modification)
By this application the Petitioner seeks reduction of the surefy amount from Rs. 25,0001- to minimum possible and further reduction of the surety frorn two to one.
It rnay be noted that, according to the Petitioner he has not been able to furnish the surety bond in view of his financial condition.
The conditions of the two sureties were put because the Petitioner was involved in another FIR under Section 25 Arms Act. As per the nominal roll the Petitioner has already undergone the sentence relating to the said FIR
No. 353/2000 and the sentence in default of fine is yet to be undergone. w.P.(cRL) 14s/2011 Page I of 2
However, in view of the financial condition of the Petitioner the order dated
19th September, 2OII is modified to the extend that the Petitioner be now released on parole for a period of four weeks on his furnishing a personal bond inthe surn of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety of the like arnount, subject to the satisfaction of the learned Trial CourdCMM. It is clarified that the surety would be a family member or a relative of the Petitioner.
Application is disposed of.
Copy of the order be communicated to the Petitioner through
Superintendent, Tihar Jail.
A NL / l-, llYl,t"Xrt-,t/W- y ltl MUKTA GUPTA. J.
JANUARY 23,2012 tvnt w.P.(cRL) 14s/2011
23.01.2012 Crl.
M.A. No. 9L8/20L2 (modification)
By this application the Petitioner seeks reduction of the surefy amount from Rs. 25,0001- to minimum possible and further reduction of the surety frorn two to one.
It rnay be noted that, according to the Petitioner he has not been able to furnish the surety bond in view of his financial condition.
The conditions of the two sureties were put because the Petitioner was involved in another FIR under Section 25 Arms Act. As per the nominal roll the Petitioner has already undergone the sentence relating to the said FIR
No. 353/2000 and the sentence in default of fine is yet to be undergone. w.P.(cRL) 14s/2011 Page I of 2
However, in view of the financial condition of the Petitioner the order dated
19th September, 2OII is modified to the extend that the Petitioner be now released on parole for a period of four weeks on his furnishing a personal bond inthe surn of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety of the like arnount, subject to the satisfaction of the learned Trial CourdCMM. It is clarified that the surety would be a family member or a relative of the Petitioner.
Application is disposed of.
Copy of the order be communicated to the Petitioner through
Superintendent, Tihar Jail.
A NL / l-, llYl,t"Xrt-,t/W- y ltl MUKTA GUPTA. J.
JANUARY 23,2012 tvnt w.P.(cRL) 14s/2011
JUDGMENT