Full Text
Translation output
q a
\.'.-
#LL
V"T4.O9.2O1,L
Present: Mr.Saurav Aggarwal and Mr.S.K.Pandey for the petitioner.
Mr.Ashwini K.Dakheeja and Mr.Puneet Saini for the respondent.
+W.P.(C) No.4915/2010 & CM No. 9727120L0
*
The petitioner herein is aggrieved by the order dated Bth
April, 20t0 passed by the Deputy Labour Commissioner
(Central).
I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. The matter is still pending consideration before the Deputy Labour
Commissioner (Central) on the application filed by the respondent under RuIe 25(2Xv)(a)&(b) of the Contract Labour
(Regulation & Abolition) Central Rules 1.971, and the Central
Labour Act, L970 and in the said proceedings the petitioner has raised some preliminary objections.
As regards the preliminary objections raised by the petitioner, the learned Deputy Labour Commissioner (Central) in the impugned order has held that the preliminary objection of the PE is heard and decided. However, a perusal of the i\ w
2011:DHC:18299 lo impugned order clearly shows that no decision was taken by the Deputy Labour Commissioner (Central) on the preliminary objections raised by the petitioner.
Be that as it may, the matter is still pending consideration before the Deputy Labour commissioner
(Central) and it is directed that the preliminary objections
.O raised by the petitioner shall be decided by the Deputy Labour i
--., Commissioner (Central) at the time of the final disposal of the said application filed by the respondent'
Any document and/or
\.'.-
#LL
V"T4.O9.2O1,L
Present: Mr.Saurav Aggarwal and Mr.S.K.Pandey for the petitioner.
Mr.Ashwini K.Dakheeja and Mr.Puneet Saini for the respondent.
+W.P.(C) No.4915/2010 & CM No. 9727120L0
*
The petitioner herein is aggrieved by the order dated Bth
April, 20t0 passed by the Deputy Labour Commissioner
(Central).
I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. The matter is still pending consideration before the Deputy Labour
Commissioner (Central) on the application filed by the respondent under RuIe 25(2Xv)(a)&(b) of the Contract Labour
(Regulation & Abolition) Central Rules 1.971, and the Central
Labour Act, L970 and in the said proceedings the petitioner has raised some preliminary objections.
As regards the preliminary objections raised by the petitioner, the learned Deputy Labour Commissioner (Central) in the impugned order has held that the preliminary objection of the PE is heard and decided. However, a perusal of the i\ w
2011:DHC:18299 lo impugned order clearly shows that no decision was taken by the Deputy Labour Commissioner (Central) on the preliminary objections raised by the petitioner.
Be that as it may, the matter is still pending consideration before the Deputy Labour commissioner
(Central) and it is directed that the preliminary objections
.O raised by the petitioner shall be decided by the Deputy Labour i
--., Commissioner (Central) at the time of the final disposal of the said application filed by the respondent'
Any document and/or
JUDGMENT
on which the parties seek to place reliance may be placed before the Deputy
Labour Commissioner (Central).
With these directions, the writ petition stands disposed
.T of.
Parties are directed to appear before the Deputy Labour
Commissioner (Central) on tTth October, 20LL'
A
W^-
KAILASH GANIBHIR, J.\.t\-'
September L4,?OLL dc
2011:DHC:18299
Labour Commissioner (Central).
With these directions, the writ petition stands disposed
.T of.
Parties are directed to appear before the Deputy Labour
Commissioner (Central) on tTth October, 20LL'
A
W^-
KAILASH GANIBHIR, J.\.t\-'
September L4,?OLL dc
2011:DHC:18299