Full Text
Translation output
31# $~ HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL) 757/2011 & Crl.
M.A. No. 6302/2011 (Stay)
OJo NAVEEN KR. CHAUHAN & ANR ..... Petitioners
W.P.(CRL) 757/2011 & Crl.
M.A. No. 6302/2011 (Stay)
OJo NAVEEN KR. CHAUHAN & ANR ..... Petitioners
VERSUS
STATE& ORS
CORAM:
Through: Mr. Bhisham Singh and Mr. Ravi Lomod, Advocates with Petitioners in person.
Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Harsh Prabhakar and Ms. Damini Khaira, Advocates for Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel for the State with SI Tika Ram, PS Sangam Vihar.
Respondent No. 3 in person.
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
14.09.2011 Respondent No. 3, father of Petitioner No.2, is present in person and is identified by SI Tika Ram, PS Sangam Vihar. Respondent No.3 states that the
Petitioner No. 2 is a major and since he has come to know that she has married of her own free will, he has no grievance left.
Learned proxy counsel for the learned Standing Counsel for the State states that the missing report which was lodged by the Respondent No. 3 will be filed in view of the fact that the Petitioner No. 2 is a major and has married the Petitioner No. 1 of her own free will.
In view of the statement of Respondent No. 3, learned counsel for the
Petitioners on instructions from the Petitioners, who are present in Court, states that he does not press the present petition and application.
Present petition and application are dismissed as not pressed.
~~J.
SEPTEMBER 14, 2011/'vn' 2011:DHC:17112
Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Harsh Prabhakar and Ms. Damini Khaira, Advocates for Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel for the State with SI Tika Ram, PS Sangam Vihar.
Respondent No. 3 in person.
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
14.09.2011 Respondent No. 3, father of Petitioner No.2, is present in person and is identified by SI Tika Ram, PS Sangam Vihar. Respondent No.3 states that the
Petitioner No. 2 is a major and since he has come to know that she has married of her own free will, he has no grievance left.
Learned proxy counsel for the learned Standing Counsel for the State states that the missing report which was lodged by the Respondent No. 3 will be filed in view of the fact that the Petitioner No. 2 is a major and has married the Petitioner No. 1 of her own free will.
In view of the statement of Respondent No. 3, learned counsel for the
Petitioners on instructions from the Petitioners, who are present in Court, states that he does not press the present petition and application.
Present petition and application are dismissed as not pressed.
~~J.
SEPTEMBER 14, 2011/'vn' 2011:DHC:17112
JUDGMENT