Full Text
Translation output
A-t2 o/o L9.09.20Lt
Present : None for the petitioner.
Ms.Latika Chaudhary, Advocate for the respondent.
+CONT. CAS (C) No. 7B|2O1O
{<
None has appeared for the petitioner; matter has been called twice. On l-2.L1,.2010, the contempt petition i.e. Contempt Case
No. 2Bl2010 had been dismissed as the counsel for the respondents has pointed out that the compliance of the order of 25.09.2009 has been effected. Thereafter, on an application preferred by the petitioner that his pension has not been calculated correctly, notice had been ordered to the respondent; the petitioner had been directed to file the affidavit giving the correct calculations; this was vide order dated 04.02.2011; that affidavit has not yet been filed; on 16.05.2011-, this was again noted. Even today, additional affidavit has not been filed in terms thereof; matter has been called twice and none has appeared for the petitioner. Counsel for the respondents reiterates that the order of the Single Bench has been complied with in true letter and spirit. Nothing survives in this petition.
Petition disposed of.
INDERMEET KAU& J.
SEPTEMBER L9,?OLL a
2011:DHC:9616
Present : None for the petitioner.
Ms.Latika Chaudhary, Advocate for the respondent.
+CONT. CAS (C) No. 7B|2O1O
{<
None has appeared for the petitioner; matter has been called twice. On l-2.L1,.2010, the contempt petition i.e. Contempt Case
No. 2Bl2010 had been dismissed as the counsel for the respondents has pointed out that the compliance of the order of 25.09.2009 has been effected. Thereafter, on an application preferred by the petitioner that his pension has not been calculated correctly, notice had been ordered to the respondent; the petitioner had been directed to file the affidavit giving the correct calculations; this was vide order dated 04.02.2011; that affidavit has not yet been filed; on 16.05.2011-, this was again noted. Even today, additional affidavit has not been filed in terms thereof; matter has been called twice and none has appeared for the petitioner. Counsel for the respondents reiterates that the order of the Single Bench has been complied with in true letter and spirit. Nothing survives in this petition.
Petition disposed of.
INDERMEET KAU& J.
SEPTEMBER L9,?OLL a
2011:DHC:9616
JUDGMENT