Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL) 1054/2011
ASHISH KUMAR ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Ajit Kumar, Advocate along with Petitioner in person.
W.P.(CRL) 1054/2011
ASHISH KUMAR ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Ajit Kumar, Advocate along with Petitioner in person.
VERSUS
STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondent
CORAM:
Through Mr. Dayan Krishnan, A.S.C. for State with SI Krishan, PS Tilak Marg.
Anshuman Ashok, Authorized representative ofR-2 in person.
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
30.09.2011 By this petition, the Petitioner seeks quashing of the FIR No. 551/
2006 under Section 279/337 IPC P.S. Tilak Marg, Delhi registered on the com laint ofRespondent No.2 Dr. Ashutosh Prakash. Section 337 IPC was later on converted to Section 338 IPC in view ofthe opinion on the MLC.
The Respondent No. 2 is a practicing doctor in Singapur. Since he ca ot be personally present, he has issued an authority letter in favour of
Mr. Anshuman Ashok, Advocate who is brother in law of Dr. Ashutosh Prak sh. A photocopy of the employment pass and visit pass of Dr. Ashltosh Prakash has also been filed along with the authority letter. The saml are taken on record.
Sh. Anshuman Ashok, Advocate authorized representative of
2011:DHC:18108 Res ondent No. 2. Dr. Ashutosh Prakash states that the parties have ami able settled the matter and in view of the settlement arrived at between the 1 arties, he does not want to puruse the abovementioned FIR and the pro eedings arising therefrom.
In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their diffi rences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no use 1purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the inte,est of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings purs ant thereto.
Consequently, FIR No. 55112006 under Section 279/338 P.S. Tilak
Marg, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.
Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their state ents made before this Court.
The petition is disposed of. Order dasti.
EMBER 30, 2011 2011:DHC:18108
Anshuman Ashok, Authorized representative ofR-2 in person.
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
30.09.2011 By this petition, the Petitioner seeks quashing of the FIR No. 551/
2006 under Section 279/337 IPC P.S. Tilak Marg, Delhi registered on the com laint ofRespondent No.2 Dr. Ashutosh Prakash. Section 337 IPC was later on converted to Section 338 IPC in view ofthe opinion on the MLC.
The Respondent No. 2 is a practicing doctor in Singapur. Since he ca ot be personally present, he has issued an authority letter in favour of
Mr. Anshuman Ashok, Advocate who is brother in law of Dr. Ashutosh Prak sh. A photocopy of the employment pass and visit pass of Dr. Ashltosh Prakash has also been filed along with the authority letter. The saml are taken on record.
Sh. Anshuman Ashok, Advocate authorized representative of
2011:DHC:18108 Res ondent No. 2. Dr. Ashutosh Prakash states that the parties have ami able settled the matter and in view of the settlement arrived at between the 1 arties, he does not want to puruse the abovementioned FIR and the pro eedings arising therefrom.
In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their diffi rences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no use 1purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the inte,est of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings purs ant thereto.
Consequently, FIR No. 55112006 under Section 279/338 P.S. Tilak
Marg, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.
Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their state ents made before this Court.
The petition is disposed of. Order dasti.
EMBER 30, 2011 2011:DHC:18108
JUDGMENT