Full Text
Translation output
...:::.._,~
A-41
% 22.09.2011
Present: Mr. Ajay Bhatnagar, Advocate for the petitioner.
+Cont. Cas.(C) No. 726/2011
*
The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed on
01.09.2010 by virtue to which the respondent had been directed to make future payments with effect from 01.09.2010 i.e. a sum of
~LOOO/- which amount shall be paid towards water and electricity charges before the 7th day of each month. It is not in dispute that a sum of ~5,300/- as mentioned in para 3 of the order dated
01.09.2010 has since been paid. Since this order is an executable order, no contempt is made out.
Petition is dismissed.
Petitioner may approach the Maintenance TriJunal to get his grievance addressed. L
SEPTEMBER 22, 2011 rb
INDERMEET KAUR, J.
A-41
% 22.09.2011
Present: Mr. Ajay Bhatnagar, Advocate for the petitioner.
+Cont. Cas.(C) No. 726/2011
*
The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed on
01.09.2010 by virtue to which the respondent had been directed to make future payments with effect from 01.09.2010 i.e. a sum of
~LOOO/- which amount shall be paid towards water and electricity charges before the 7th day of each month. It is not in dispute that a sum of ~5,300/- as mentioned in para 3 of the order dated
01.09.2010 has since been paid. Since this order is an executable order, no contempt is made out.
Petition is dismissed.
Petitioner may approach the Maintenance TriJunal to get his grievance addressed. L
SEPTEMBER 22, 2011 rb
INDERMEET KAUR, J.
:
:_ ·--~:'~~-
'-~~~'~-
2011:DHC:9734
:_ ·--~:'~~-
'-~~~'~-
2011:DHC:9734
JUDGMENT