Full Text
UNREPORTED
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
FAO 773/2003
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate.
Through: None.
Date of Decision: September 22, 2011
JUDGMENT
1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether judgment should be reported in Digest? JUDGMENT (ORAL): REVA KHETRAPAL, J.
1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 09.09.2003 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarding an interim compensation of ` 50,000/- in favour of the petitioners under 2011:DHC:4903 Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, with a direction to the respondent No.1 to deposit the cheques in the sum of ` 50,000/- along with interest thereon in the manner apportioned by the learned Tribunal.
2. Although a number of grounds of appeal have been raised and the prayer in the appeal is for setting aside of the impugned order, Mr. Pankaj Seth, the learned counsel for the appellant at the time of hearing has confined his submissions to the findings given by the learned Tribunal in paragraph 7 of the impugned order. He contends that in view of the fact that the Insurance Company has raised a defence under Section 149(2) of the Act to the effect that the insurance policy in question was cancelled on account of the dishonour of the premium cheque on presentation, the learned Tribunal has caused grave prejudice to the appellant – Insurance Company by recording that: “Admittedly the offending truck was insured for the period 19.04.2002 to 18.04.2003.”
3. In view of the aforesaid submissions made by Mr. Seth, the learned counsel for the appellant, it is clarified that the Insurance Company shall be at liberty to defend the claim petition on the ground of dishonour of the premium cheque by adducing evidence in this regard at the time of trial and no observation made in the impugned order shall prejudice the rights of the appellant – Insurance Company in any manner.
4. The appeal stands disposed of with the aforesaid observations.
5. The record of the Claims Tribunal be sent back forthwith. Parties are directed to appear before the learned Claims Tribunal on 17th October, 2011.
6. Court notice may be issued by the learned Claims Tribunal to the concerned parties.
7. A copy of this order be given dasti to the counsel for the appellant, as prayed.
REVA KHETRAPAL (JUDGE) September 22, 2011 ak