Full Text
Translation output
Crl.A.Nos. 224, 251, 272 & 368/2009 Page 1 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
RESERVED ON : 14.09.2011
Date of Decision: 23.09.2011
CRL.A. 224/2009
RAVI @ TITU
RAVI @ TITU
CRL.A. 251/2009
RAJENDER @ PAPPU
RAJENDER @ PAPPU
CRL.A. 272/2009
SATBIR
SATBIR
CRL.A. 368/2009
MUKESH
…Appellants
MUKESH
…Appellants
VERSUS
STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent in all matters
Appearance: Mr. T.D. Sharma, Advocate in Crl. A. 224/2009.
Mr. Anurag Jain, Advocate in Crl. A. 251/2009.
Mr. Siddhartha Luthra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anwesh Madhukar and
Mr.Yashpreet Singh, Advocates for appellant in Crl. A. 272/2009.
Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocate in Crl. A. 368/2009.
Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP on behalf of the State in all matters.
Appearance: Mr. T.D. Sharma, Advocate in Crl. A. 224/2009.
Mr. Anurag Jain, Advocate in Crl. A. 251/2009.
Mr. Siddhartha Luthra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anwesh Madhukar and
Mr.Yashpreet Singh, Advocates for appellant in Crl. A. 272/2009.
Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocate in Crl. A. 368/2009.
Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP on behalf of the State in all matters.
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL
JUDGMENT
1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to Reporter or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? 2011:DHC:4953-DB Crl.A.Nos. 224, 251, 272 & 368/2009 Page 2 MR.
JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT %
1. The present criminal appeals being Crl.A. Nos.224/2009, 251/009 and 368/2009 are dismissed and Crl.A. No. 272/2009 is allowed in terms of the separate judgment passed today in Criminal Appeal No. 191/2009 titled Amar Mishra Vs. State of Delhi.
2. For detailed order please see the above mentioned judgment.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT
(JUDGE)
G.P.MITTAL (JUDGE) September 23, 2011