Full Text
Translation output
$-
* IN THE HIGH COURT
CRL.REV.P. r64l2QrQ
ABDUL SALAM
Thrqugh
OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI..... Petitioner
Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate. o
VETSUS
GIAN PRAKASH VED PRAKASH ..... Respondent
Through Mr. Durga Parsad, Advocate.
Dr. Syed Mansoor Jamal in Person.
* IN THE HIGH COURT
CRL.REV.P. r64l2QrQ
ABDUL SALAM
Thrqugh
OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI..... Petitioner
Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate. o
VETSUS
GIAN PRAKASH VED PRAKASH ..... Respondent
Through Mr. Durga Parsad, Advocate.
Dr. Syed Mansoor Jamal in Person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
26.09.2011
Dr. Syed Mansoor Jamal is present in Court today. He has filed photocopy of his degree according to which he is bachelor of Unani
Medicine & Surgery. A copy of the notice published by Department of
Health and Family Welfare, Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi has also been filed which permits Dr. Syed Mansoor Jamal to issue certificates.
In view of the explanation, nothing more is required to be answered by Dr. Syed Mansoor Jamal. Notice issued to him is discharged.
.
Crl.
M.A. No. 1.L509/201L
By this application moved by the parties, it is stated that the matter has been settled. In view of the settlement arrived, all the claims of the
C omplainant/Respondent has been settled.
2011:DHC:19657
The Petitioner was convicted for offence under Section 138 of the
Negotiable Instruments Act(in short the 'N.I. Act') and awarded imprisonment for a period of one year and a fine of Rs. One lakh and in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for flrther one year. Out of the said amount of Rs. One lakh, if realized ns.gS,OOO/- was paid to the Complainant as compensation. In an appeal before the learned Addl. Sessions Judge while maintaining the conviction, the sentence of the Petitioner was reduced to six months, the other conditions remaining the ,u-..
. This is a revision petition against the impugned orders. Since the parties have entered into a settlement, the offence is compoundable and compounding is permissible even at the stage of revision petition, in the interest ofjustice parties are perniitted to compound the offence.
Complainant/Respondent who is present in Court and is identified by his counsel states that he has settled the matter and in view of the settlement he does not want to pursue the abovementioned complaint and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, the order of learned Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate and learned Addl. Sessions
Judge in complaint case No. 197912001 under Section 138 of the N.I. Act titled as "Gian Parkash vs. Abdul Salam" directing him to imprisonment are hereby quashed.
Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court.
Petition and application are disposed of. Order Dasti. fl,w'ftf"4"T'9-
, MUKTA GUPTA,J
SEPTEMBER 26,20II tdkt frld,a1"l^'\ bt
-Y'tn'6'"""
&i Dst\*'
$.r"!sJ'*\ t1'*'\'?
\\vr-\9\[r, s\ 1v>ct)
| r+
26.09.2011
Dr. Syed Mansoor Jamal is present in Court today. He has filed photocopy of his degree according to which he is bachelor of Unani
Medicine & Surgery. A copy of the notice published by Department of
Health and Family Welfare, Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi has also been filed which permits Dr. Syed Mansoor Jamal to issue certificates.
In view of the explanation, nothing more is required to be answered by Dr. Syed Mansoor Jamal. Notice issued to him is discharged.
.
Crl.
M.A. No. 1.L509/201L
By this application moved by the parties, it is stated that the matter has been settled. In view of the settlement arrived, all the claims of the
C omplainant/Respondent has been settled.
2011:DHC:19657
The Petitioner was convicted for offence under Section 138 of the
Negotiable Instruments Act(in short the 'N.I. Act') and awarded imprisonment for a period of one year and a fine of Rs. One lakh and in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for flrther one year. Out of the said amount of Rs. One lakh, if realized ns.gS,OOO/- was paid to the Complainant as compensation. In an appeal before the learned Addl. Sessions Judge while maintaining the conviction, the sentence of the Petitioner was reduced to six months, the other conditions remaining the ,u-..
. This is a revision petition against the impugned orders. Since the parties have entered into a settlement, the offence is compoundable and compounding is permissible even at the stage of revision petition, in the interest ofjustice parties are perniitted to compound the offence.
Complainant/Respondent who is present in Court and is identified by his counsel states that he has settled the matter and in view of the settlement he does not want to pursue the abovementioned complaint and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, the order of learned Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate and learned Addl. Sessions
Judge in complaint case No. 197912001 under Section 138 of the N.I. Act titled as "Gian Parkash vs. Abdul Salam" directing him to imprisonment are hereby quashed.
Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court.
Petition and application are disposed of. Order Dasti. fl,w'ftf"4"T'9-
, MUKTA GUPTA,J
SEPTEMBER 26,20II tdkt frld,a1"l^'\ bt
-Y'tn'6'"""
&i Dst\*'
$.r"!sJ'*\ t1'*'\'?
\\vr-\9\[r, s\ 1v>ct)
| r+
JUDGMENT