Full Text
W.P.(C)7086/2011
P.T.RANGAMANI Petitioner
Through Mr.0. Hari Shankar & Mr. S.
Sunil, Advocates.
Through Mr. Jatan Singh. CGSC for UOI.
Mr. Mukesh Anand & Mr. R.G. S.
Bhadoria, Advocates for respondent Nos.
2 and 3.
M. /W.P.(C)7087/2011 A.P.VENKATESWARAN Petitioner
Through Mr. C. Hari Shankar & Mr. S.
Through Mr. Sachin Datta, CGSC for UOI. jt Mr. Mukesh Anand & Mr. R.C.S.
^ Bhadoria, Advocates for respondent Nos.
2 and 3.
TULSYAN NEC LTD. Petitioner
Through Mr. Jatan Singh,CGSC for UOI.
Mr. Mukesh Anand & Mr. R.C. S.
2011:DHC:16034 Q Bhadoria, Advocates for respondent Nos
2 and 3.
LALIT KUMAR TULSYAN Petitioner
Through Mr. Sachin Datta, CGSC for UOI.
Mr. Mukesh Anand & Mr. R.C. S.
Bhadoria, Advocates for respondent Nos.
2 and 3.
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA
26.09.2011 Heard Mr. 0. Hari Shankar, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Jatan Singh & Mr. Sachin Datta, learned
^ Standing Counsel for Union of India and Mr. Mukesh Anand, learned Standing Counsel for CentralExcise and Customs.
ORDER
2. In these writ petitions the basic challenge is to the issuance of notice to show cause. A contention has been raised by Mr. C. Hari Shankar that the documents that were asked for were not given. Ordinarily, we would have adverted to the same, but we have been apprised in the meantime that the Adjudicating Officer has passed thefinal order.
3. in view of the aforesaid, it is ncessary that the petitioner should exhaust the forum of appeal. Needless to emphasize, it is open to the petitioners to raise the plea of violation of natural justice before the appellate authority. Thatapart,all other pleas, which touch the aspect of jurisdiction, can be raised before the appellate authority which shall be addressed in proper perspective.
4. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petitions are accordingly disposed of.
SEPTEMBER 26,2011 VKR ^ /pry-' CHIEF JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA,J.