Full Text
Translation output
% 27.09.2011
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Soahib Haider, Advocate for R-1.
Mr. jayant Tripathi, Advocate for the respondent/AS! &
Govt. of Delhi.
+ CONT. CAS (C) No. 395/2011
*
Respondents have put in appearance. None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the respondent has pointed out that in terms of annexure 'C' which is a communication sent by the
Department of respondent No.1 dated 29th April, 2011, the petitioner has been informed that the Mosque in question has not been declared as a centrally prot~cted monument, and hence, the maintenance of the same is not within the ambit of the
Archaeological Survey of India. This communication (annexure
'C'), also states that the petitioner had himself, in his application, stated that this ancient monument is not a protected one under the
Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act,
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Soahib Haider, Advocate for R-1.
Mr. jayant Tripathi, Advocate for the respondent/AS! &
Govt. of Delhi.
+ CONT. CAS (C) No. 395/2011
*
Respondents have put in appearance. None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the respondent has pointed out that in terms of annexure 'C' which is a communication sent by the
Department of respondent No.1 dated 29th April, 2011, the petitioner has been informed that the Mosque in question has not been declared as a centrally prot~cted monument, and hence, the maintenance of the same is not within the ambit of the
Archaeological Survey of India. This communication (annexure
'C'), also states that the petitioner had himself, in his application, stated that this ancient monument is not a protected one under the
Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act,
JUDGMENT
1958 Act 1958 but was found to have been notified by Delhi Administration as a Wakf property at serial No. 386 vide notification No. 10469/75-DWB. Learned counsels for the respondents have pointed out that if the petitioner is aggrieved, he may approach the Wakf Board. This submission has force. CONT. CAS (C) No. 395/2011 page 1 of2 ) - I I 2011:DHC:9767 / / / 0/ Nothing survives in this petition, it is dispostof accordingly. SEPTEMBER 271 2011 jj_K, CONT. CAS (C) No. 395/2011 INDERMEET KAURI J. page2 of2 '1 - ! - I 2011:DHC:9767
JUDGMENT