Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 3276/2011
/o NEERAJ JAIN & ORS ..... Petitioners
CRL.M.C. 3276/2011
/o NEERAJ JAIN & ORS ..... Petitioners
VERSUS
Through: Mr.Anil Aggarwal and Ms.Rekha Aggarwal, Advocates with Petitioners m person
STATE & ANR ..... Respondents
STATE & ANR ..... Respondents
CORAM:
Through: Mr.Mukesh Gupta, APP for the State Mr.Satish K.Sansi, Advocate for
Respondent No.2 with Respondent No.2 m person
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
28.09.2011 Crl.M.A.No.11645/2011 (for exemption)
Exemption is allowed subject to just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
Crl.M.C.3276/2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No.776/2004 under Sections
498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS Rohini, Delhi.
The complainant/Respondent No. 2 Ms. Meena is present in person
'
'
~' --·~J., "-,-!, 2011:DHC:10282 ':L and is identified by her counsel. She states that the Petitioners and
Respondent No.2/Complainant have entered into a Compromise. In terms of the settlement, marriage between the Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent
No.2/complainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual I consent. As part of full and final settlement of all the claims of the
Respondent No. 2, the Petitioner No. 1 has paid ~ 3.5 lakhs, out of which ~
2.5 lakhs have already been paid to her and ~ 1 lakh has been paid in cash ,__..[
'!· today in Court. She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings
,~ pursuant thereto.
Consequently, FIR No.776/2004 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS Rohini, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. ~·~4
Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court.
~ The petition stands disposed of. Order dasti.
SEPTEMBER 28, 2011 'de' elf~ ~< ~~ ~ l d e_;;_l,::fti~ r e:J,:.hv-:,~ ft"o-lo~.
/9tf~ (lWfi.-N;4412J-IH)
-¥etA ~h· /t1l \?> -~-:s-fi)
~~ MUKTA GUPTA, J.
/1-e~ } ~~~ ~ N dUA.~ tll)' ' &M-~~4 {,(~ ~kS r
~I ~I 1or(l<tr
'!•
__:,_:_., ~
Respondent No.2 with Respondent No.2 m person
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
28.09.2011 Crl.M.A.No.11645/2011 (for exemption)
Exemption is allowed subject to just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
Crl.M.C.3276/2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No.776/2004 under Sections
498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS Rohini, Delhi.
The complainant/Respondent No. 2 Ms. Meena is present in person
'
'
~' --·~J., "-,-!, 2011:DHC:10282 ':L and is identified by her counsel. She states that the Petitioners and
Respondent No.2/Complainant have entered into a Compromise. In terms of the settlement, marriage between the Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent
No.2/complainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual I consent. As part of full and final settlement of all the claims of the
Respondent No. 2, the Petitioner No. 1 has paid ~ 3.5 lakhs, out of which ~
2.5 lakhs have already been paid to her and ~ 1 lakh has been paid in cash ,__..[
'!· today in Court. She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings
,~ pursuant thereto.
Consequently, FIR No.776/2004 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS Rohini, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. ~·~4
Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court.
~ The petition stands disposed of. Order dasti.
SEPTEMBER 28, 2011 'de' elf~ ~< ~~ ~ l d e_;;_l,::fti~ r e:J,:.hv-:,~ ft"o-lo~.
/9tf~ (lWfi.-N;4412J-IH)
-¥etA ~h· /t1l \?> -~-:s-fi)
~~ MUKTA GUPTA, J.
/1-e~ } ~~~ ~ N dUA.~ tll)' ' &M-~~4 {,(~ ~kS r
~I ~I 1or(l<tr
'!•
__:,_:_., ~
JUDGMENT