Full Text
Translation output
•
54#$~ HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 3261/2011
PANKAJ
54#$~ HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 3261/2011
PANKAJ
VERSUS
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. K. Venkataraman, Advocate with Petitioner in person.
STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for the State.
Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate for Respondent No. 2 with Respondent
No.2 in person.
Through: Mr. K. Venkataraman, Advocate with Petitioner in person.
STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for the State.
Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate for Respondent No. 2 with Respondent
No.2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
28.09.2011 Crl.
M.A. NO. 11587/2011 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
· Crl. M.C. 326112011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 258/2010 under Sections
498A/406/506/34 IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 registered at PS Yamuna Vihar/Gokulpuri, Delhi.
The Complainant/Respondent No. 2 Ms. Pooja is present in person and is identified by her counsel. She states that the Petitioners and
Respondent No.2/Complainant have entered into a Compromise. In terms of
CRL.M.C. 326112011 2011:DHC:13097 the settlement, marriage between the Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent NO. 2/Complainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent.
As full and final settlement of all the claims of the Respondent No. 2, the
Petitioner No. 1 has to pay ~7.1 0 lakhs out of which ~3 .60 lakhs have already been paid to her and ~3.50 lakhs have been paid to her vide demand draft No. 283074 dated 28th September, 2011 drawn on Bank of Baroda, Delhi. She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings
' pursuant thereto.
In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
• Consequently, FIR No. 258/2010 under Sections 498A/406/506/34
IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 registered at PS
Yamuna Vihar/Gokulpuri, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.
CRL.M.C. 326112011 Page 2 of3 Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their) statements made before this Court.
The petition is disposed of. Order dasti.
~~ /MUKTAGUPTA,J.
28.09.2011 Crl.
M.A. NO. 11587/2011 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
· Crl. M.C. 326112011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 258/2010 under Sections
498A/406/506/34 IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 registered at PS Yamuna Vihar/Gokulpuri, Delhi.
The Complainant/Respondent No. 2 Ms. Pooja is present in person and is identified by her counsel. She states that the Petitioners and
Respondent No.2/Complainant have entered into a Compromise. In terms of
CRL.M.C. 326112011 2011:DHC:13097 the settlement, marriage between the Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent NO. 2/Complainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent.
As full and final settlement of all the claims of the Respondent No. 2, the
Petitioner No. 1 has to pay ~7.1 0 lakhs out of which ~3 .60 lakhs have already been paid to her and ~3.50 lakhs have been paid to her vide demand draft No. 283074 dated 28th September, 2011 drawn on Bank of Baroda, Delhi. She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings
' pursuant thereto.
In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
• Consequently, FIR No. 258/2010 under Sections 498A/406/506/34
IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 registered at PS
Yamuna Vihar/Gokulpuri, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.
CRL.M.C. 326112011 Page 2 of3 Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their) statements made before this Court.
The petition is disposed of. Order dasti.
~~ /MUKTAGUPTA,J.
JUDGMENT