Full Text
Translation output
74# S-
* IN THE HIGH COURT
+ W.P.(CRL) I36TI2QTT
NEERAJ & ANR.
Through:
OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI..... Petitioners
Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Sr. Advocate with
Mr. Rakesh Boghra, Advocates with
Petitioners in person.
VETSUS
STATE & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Ms. Laxmi Chauhan, Advocate for
Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel with SI Raghunath, PS P.P. Pur.
Mr. Sanjay Rathi, Advocate for Mr. Ajay Chaudhary, Advocate for
Respondent No. 2 with Respondent
No. 2 in person.
* IN THE HIGH COURT
+ W.P.(CRL) I36TI2QTT
NEERAJ & ANR.
Through:
OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI..... Petitioners
Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Sr. Advocate with
Mr. Rakesh Boghra, Advocates with
Petitioners in person.
VETSUS
STATE & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Ms. Laxmi Chauhan, Advocate for
Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel with SI Raghunath, PS P.P. Pur.
Mr. Sanjay Rathi, Advocate for Mr. Ajay Chaudhary, Advocate for
Respondent No. 2 with Respondent
No. 2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
30.09.2011
Crl.
M.A. No. 1.17611201i (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
W.P. (Crl.) 1361/2011
By this petition the Petitioners seeks quashing of FIR No. 9/2009 undeqSections 3071506/34 IPC registered at PS Pul Prahlad Pur, New Delhi.
The Complainant/Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 who are the injured persons are present in person and are identified by the learned counsel and w.P.(cRL) 1361/2011 o
Page I of 3
2011:DHC:18255 u the Investigating Qfficer. They state that in a fight which occurred between both the parties who received injuries, they have now settled the matter as they are neighbourers. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 further state that in view of the settlement, they do not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
Learned proxy counsel for the learned Standing Counsel for the State states that the injuries received by the Respondent Nos. 2 and3 are lacerated wounds on the head. The injuries were opined not to be grievous in nature.
It is further stated that besides the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 there is no other injured and besides Petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 there is no other accused involved in the present FIR.
In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
Consequently, FIR No. 912009 under Sections 307/506134 IPC registered at PS Pul Prahlad Pur, New Delhi and proceedings pursuant
\|/.P.(CRL) 1361/2011 theretb are hereby quashed.
Parties, who are duly identified by their counsels, have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court.
. The petition is disposed of. Order dasti. lMfurL
-
MUKTA GUPTA. J.
/J -L f la-,)47 *t- t/2 n
-/ / frL+&orteZ6a*a
/ , -^l
.l^r-lr-l K b**n"ttt .
D[ )6t6/ar r- '
3of</tt .
SEPTEMBER 3O,2OTI tvn' w.P.(cRL) 1361/2011
5-$4r- tLA^^-hld R>t3
1&D,K-
(
30.09.2011
Crl.
M.A. No. 1.17611201i (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
W.P. (Crl.) 1361/2011
By this petition the Petitioners seeks quashing of FIR No. 9/2009 undeqSections 3071506/34 IPC registered at PS Pul Prahlad Pur, New Delhi.
The Complainant/Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 who are the injured persons are present in person and are identified by the learned counsel and w.P.(cRL) 1361/2011 o
Page I of 3
2011:DHC:18255 u the Investigating Qfficer. They state that in a fight which occurred between both the parties who received injuries, they have now settled the matter as they are neighbourers. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 further state that in view of the settlement, they do not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
Learned proxy counsel for the learned Standing Counsel for the State states that the injuries received by the Respondent Nos. 2 and3 are lacerated wounds on the head. The injuries were opined not to be grievous in nature.
It is further stated that besides the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 there is no other injured and besides Petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 there is no other accused involved in the present FIR.
In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
Consequently, FIR No. 912009 under Sections 307/506134 IPC registered at PS Pul Prahlad Pur, New Delhi and proceedings pursuant
\|/.P.(CRL) 1361/2011 theretb are hereby quashed.
Parties, who are duly identified by their counsels, have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court.
. The petition is disposed of. Order dasti. lMfurL
-
MUKTA GUPTA. J.
/J -L f la-,)47 *t- t/2 n
-/ / frL+&orteZ6a*a
/ , -^l
.l^r-lr-l K b**n"ttt .
D[ )6t6/ar r- '
3of</tt .
SEPTEMBER 3O,2OTI tvn' w.P.(cRL) 1361/2011
5-$4r- tLA^^-hld R>t3
1&D,K-
(
W
WT
( rfi'-hl u**f\r'r'"
I l\
' t. LA)'tl n Y qJr'': Xrr' la' I tta
7t n Y/ | no/ | r\
I
WT
( rfi'-hl u**f\r'r'"
I l\
' t. LA)'tl n Y qJr'': Xrr' la' I tta
7t n Y/ | no/ | r\
I
JUDGMENT