Nand Kishorb & Ors v. State & Anr

Delhi High Court · 30 Sep 2011 · 2011:DHC:10194
Mukta Gupta
CRL.M.C. 2725/2011
2011:DHC:10194
criminal petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 427, 452, 323, and 134 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's withdrawal of the complaint.

Full Text
Translation output
n/ I9 $- HIGH COURT OF DELHI CRL.M.C..2725t2Qrr
NAND KISHORB & ORS ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Atul Kumar, Advocate VETSUS STATE & ANR ..... Respondent
Through Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for the State with SI Pawan Kumar.
Mr. Ekta Verma. Adv. for R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
30.09.2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 30912001 under Sections
4271452/323134IPC registered at PS Prasad Nagar, Delhi on the complaint of Respondent No. 2.
As per the status report, the Petitioners are the accused involved and there is no other victim/complainant besides Respondent No. 2.
The complainant/Respondent No. 2 is present in person who is identified by the Investigating Officer. The complainant states that the disputes between the Petitioners and him have been amicably resolved with
CRL.M.C.2725/2011 o
2011:DHC:10194 the intervention of the common friends and neighbours. In view of the fact that the disputes between the parties have been resolved the complainant does not want to pursue the present complaint.
Since the parties have amicably resolved their difference and the pendency of the present proceedings will bring further acrimony and disharmony between the two, it would be in the interest of justice if the present FIR is quashed. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question.
Accordingly, FIR No. 309/2001 under Sections 42714521323134 IPC registered at PS Prasad Nagar, Delhi and the proceedings pursuant thereto are quashed.
Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court.
Petition stands disposed of. Order dasti.
M,' {aqf -.) U SEPTEMBER 30,201.1.
Kr"r'dk' l)1^8A-.@- , MUKTA GUPTA.J J, )
TRL.M.C. 2725/2011
"" |fr)
,'Ji5nnri (\ :drte'\\ ' ,-ry";,rLLe2'r2 A ill*' /.b^^h4
I <?.rl'?\ nt , -- fs't "y?ry.9 'Itu ffi$'s)
2011:DHC:10194
JUDGMENT