Full Text
Translation output
$- HIGH COURT OF DELHI CO.PET. 320/20 1 1 RENUKA WADHWA Petitioner
Through: Mr. Naveen Goel with Mr. Rishi Bhatnagar, Advocates
Through: Mr. Naveen Goel with Mr. Rishi Bhatnagar, Advocates
VERSUS
UNTVERSAL MEDI-AID SERVICES LTD & ANR.....Respondent
Through: Mr. Swetank Shantanu & Mr. Chinmay Kumar, Advocates with Mr. G.P. Sureka, respondent No. 2 in person
Through: Mr. Swetank Shantanu & Mr. Chinmay Kumar, Advocates with Mr. G.P. Sureka, respondent No. 2 in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
30.09.2011 Today in Court, learned counsel for the respondent has handed over to learned counsel for the petitioner a pay order no. 459568 dated 121h
September, 2011 drawn on Punjab National Bank, Shakurbasti, Sainik
Vihar, Delhi - 110 034 for a sum of Rs. 2,28,000/-.
It is pertinent to mention that the aforesaid amount is the admitted liability in the respondent-company's balance sheet at page 79 of the paper
2011:DHC:9146 I' F 3.- book.
Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a civil suit for the balance claim amount.
Needless to say, this order is without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the respondent company.
The competent Court/authority before whom appropriate recovery proceedings are filed by the petitioner, shall decide the case on merits without being influenced by any observations of this Court.
L--k MANMOHANT SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 NG I']
2011:DHC:9146
30.09.2011 Today in Court, learned counsel for the respondent has handed over to learned counsel for the petitioner a pay order no. 459568 dated 121h
September, 2011 drawn on Punjab National Bank, Shakurbasti, Sainik
Vihar, Delhi - 110 034 for a sum of Rs. 2,28,000/-.
It is pertinent to mention that the aforesaid amount is the admitted liability in the respondent-company's balance sheet at page 79 of the paper
2011:DHC:9146 I' F 3.- book.
Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a civil suit for the balance claim amount.
Needless to say, this order is without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the respondent company.
The competent Court/authority before whom appropriate recovery proceedings are filed by the petitioner, shall decide the case on merits without being influenced by any observations of this Court.
L--k MANMOHANT SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 NG I']
2011:DHC:9146
JUDGMENT