Full Text
Translation output
$-2
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF' DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CRL.M.C .209112010
SI-IYAM SLINDER & OTHERS ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Amreek Singh, Adv. with petitioners in person.
VETSUS
STATE, & ORS ..... Respondent
Through IVk. Mukesh Gupta, APP for State with ASI Surrender Singh PS New
Ashok Nagar.
R-2 in person.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF' DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CRL.M.C .209112010
SI-IYAM SLINDER & OTHERS ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Amreek Singh, Adv. with petitioners in person.
VETSUS
STATE, & ORS ..... Respondent
Through IVk. Mukesh Gupta, APP for State with ASI Surrender Singh PS New
Ashok Nagar.
R-2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
03.10.2011
This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 10012004 under Sections
498N406/34 IPC registered at PS New Ashok Nagar, CAW Cell, Krishna
Nagar, Delhi.
The cornplainant/Respondent No. 2 Ms. Sarita Pathak is present in person and is identified by the Investigating Officer. She states that she has a received a sum of Rs. 34,0001- and the FDs in the name of two daughters for
Rs. 2lakhs and Rs. 1.5 lakhs. She also states that the property which was agreed to be transfened in the name of the son has been transfemed in his
CRL.M.C. 2091/2010 page I of 2
\
2011:DHC:10152
'i v ffi ocroBER o3,2oll
' --o n'gu'
0>
CRL.M.C. 2091/2010
-M pnge 2 of 2 l rtasy a-V 6. a"l/ qg(8d -
<-
*-,?.iL'L/, -
{t* zs-qra name on the 12tr' September, 20lL She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
In view of the fact that the par-ties have amicably resolved their difftrences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
Consequently, FIR No. 10012004 under Sections 498N406134 IPC registered at PS New Ashok Nagar, CAW Cell, I3ishna Nagar, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.
It is further clirected that the maintenance deposited by the Petitioner
No.1 before the Learned Trial Court will be returned back to the Petitioner.
Parlies have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their staterncnts made before this Court
The petition is disposed of. Order dasti. fn^ thA /L ^h
Iflwtvnrynqt l/' { /--
MUKTA GUPTA"J l!+ toufl--
.r,_r. (l_
**a.o2a
2011:DHC:10152
03.10.2011
This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 10012004 under Sections
498N406/34 IPC registered at PS New Ashok Nagar, CAW Cell, Krishna
Nagar, Delhi.
The cornplainant/Respondent No. 2 Ms. Sarita Pathak is present in person and is identified by the Investigating Officer. She states that she has a received a sum of Rs. 34,0001- and the FDs in the name of two daughters for
Rs. 2lakhs and Rs. 1.5 lakhs. She also states that the property which was agreed to be transfened in the name of the son has been transfemed in his
CRL.M.C. 2091/2010 page I of 2
\
2011:DHC:10152
'i v ffi ocroBER o3,2oll
' --o n'gu'
0>
CRL.M.C. 2091/2010
-M pnge 2 of 2 l rtasy a-V 6. a"l/ qg(8d -
<-
*-,?.iL'L/, -
{t* zs-qra name on the 12tr' September, 20lL She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
In view of the fact that the par-ties have amicably resolved their difftrences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
Consequently, FIR No. 10012004 under Sections 498N406134 IPC registered at PS New Ashok Nagar, CAW Cell, I3ishna Nagar, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.
It is further clirected that the maintenance deposited by the Petitioner
No.1 before the Learned Trial Court will be returned back to the Petitioner.
Parlies have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their staterncnts made before this Court
The petition is disposed of. Order dasti. fn^ thA /L ^h
Iflwtvnrynqt l/' { /--
MUKTA GUPTA"J l!+ toufl--
.r,_r. (l_
**a.o2a
2011:DHC:10152
JUDGMENT