Harmesh Lal & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 12 Oct 2011 · 2011:DHC:5217
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw
WP(C) No. 3913/08
2011:DHC:5217
other other Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court declined to allow local reporters access to the judgment and referred the substantive decision to another related writ petition.

Full Text
Translation output
WP(C) No. 3913/08 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 12th October, 2011 W.P.(C) No. 3913/2008
HARMESH LAL & ANR. ........Petitioners
Through: Mr. Sanat Kumar, Ms. Poonam Solanki & Mr. Sumeet Anand, Adv.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .......Respondents
Through: Mr. B.V. Niren, Adv. for R-1 Ms. Mala Narayan, Mr. Rahul Narayan & Mr. Shiv Shankar, Advs. for R-2
CORAM :-
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
JUDGMENT

1. Whether reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Not Necessary.

2. To be referred to the reporter or not? Not Necessary.

3. Whether the judgment should be reported Not Necessary. in the Digest?

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J. For judgment, see W.P.(C) 2759/2007 titled Roshan Lal & Anr. Vs. Union of India & Anr..

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW (JUDGE) OCTOBER 12, 2011 Bs.