Verinder Singh v. Amrish Kapoor & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 12 Oct 2011 · 2011:DHC:5218
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw
CONT.CAS(C) 137/2011
2011:DHC:5218
other other Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court declined to allow local reporters access to the judgment and refused to have it reported or included in the Digest, exercising its procedural discretion.

Full Text
Translation output
CCP 137/2011
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 12th October, 2011
CONT.CAS(C) 137/2011
VERINDER SINGH ......Petitioner/Relator
Through: Mr. Sanat Kumar, Ms. Poonam Solanki & Mr. Sumeet Anand, Adv.
VERSUS
AMRISH KAPOOR & ANR. .....Respondents/Alleged Contemnors
Through: Ms. Mala Narayan, Mr. Rahul Narayan & Mr. Shiv Shankar, Advs.
CORAM :-
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
JUDGMENT

1. Whether reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Not Necessary.

2. To be referred to the reporter or not? Not Necessary.

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Not Necessary.

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J. For judgment, see W.P.(C) 2759/2007 titled Roshan Lal & Anr. Vs. Union of India & Anr..

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW (JUDGE) OCTOBER 12, 2011 bs