Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL) 804/2011
PARAMJIT SINGH @ BITTOO ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Bhupesh Narula, Advocate
W.P.(CRL) 804/2011
PARAMJIT SINGH @ BITTOO ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Bhupesh Narula, Advocate
VERSUS
STATE
CORAM: ..... Respondent
Through Mr. Amit Singh Rathore, proxy counsel for Mr. Saleem Ahmed, ASC for State with Insp. Ram Niwas.
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
05.10.2011 By this petition, the Petitioner seeks parole on the ground that he has to file Special Leave Petition before the hon'ble Supreme Court and to arrange finance thereof.
On a notice being issued, a status report has been filed. As per the status report, the wife of the Petitioner teaches children in the locality and earn livelihood. Besides this, the wife of the Petitioner is residing in their own house along with two daughters and parents.
The appeal of the Petitioner was dismissed on 201 h August, 2010.
However, he surrendered only on 13th November, 2010 and thus in the interregnum he had sufficient opportunity to file Special Leave Petition
2011:DHC:18074 I~ which he did not avail.
I find no reason to grant parole to the Petitioner on the ground that he has to file Special Leave Petition, as the wife ofthe Petitioner is literate and can file Special Leave Petition and Petitioner too can file Special Leave
Petitioner from Tihar Jail.
Petition is dismissed.
OCTOBER 05, 2011 'dk' 2011:DHC:18074
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
05.10.2011 By this petition, the Petitioner seeks parole on the ground that he has to file Special Leave Petition before the hon'ble Supreme Court and to arrange finance thereof.
On a notice being issued, a status report has been filed. As per the status report, the wife of the Petitioner teaches children in the locality and earn livelihood. Besides this, the wife of the Petitioner is residing in their own house along with two daughters and parents.
The appeal of the Petitioner was dismissed on 201 h August, 2010.
However, he surrendered only on 13th November, 2010 and thus in the interregnum he had sufficient opportunity to file Special Leave Petition
2011:DHC:18074 I~ which he did not avail.
I find no reason to grant parole to the Petitioner on the ground that he has to file Special Leave Petition, as the wife ofthe Petitioner is literate and can file Special Leave Petition and Petitioner too can file Special Leave
Petitioner from Tihar Jail.
Petition is dismissed.
OCTOBER 05, 2011 'dk' 2011:DHC:18074
JUDGMENT