Full Text
Translation output
'ar s4#$-
* IN TIIE IIIGH COURT t- w.P.(cRL) r396l20tr
I,AXMAN SINGFI & ORS.
OF DELIII AT NEW DEI,HI..... Petitioners
'fhrough: Mr. Parminder Sherawat, Advocate with Petitioners in Person.
VETSUS
STATE &ANI{. ..... ItesPondents
Through: Ms. Laxmi Chauhan, Advocate for
Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel with SI Saroj Bala and Ranbir Singh.
Mr. Sudhanshi Tomar, Advocate for
Respondent No. 2 with ResPondent
No. 2 in person.
* IN TIIE IIIGH COURT t- w.P.(cRL) r396l20tr
I,AXMAN SINGFI & ORS.
OF DELIII AT NEW DEI,HI..... Petitioners
'fhrough: Mr. Parminder Sherawat, Advocate with Petitioners in Person.
VETSUS
STATE &ANI{. ..... ItesPondents
Through: Ms. Laxmi Chauhan, Advocate for
Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel with SI Saroj Bala and Ranbir Singh.
Mr. Sudhanshi Tomar, Advocate for
Respondent No. 2 with ResPondent
No. 2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
13.10.2011 lhis is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 6Il20L0 under Sections
498A/406/34IPC registered at PS Kapashcra, Delhr. fhe complainant/Respondent No. 2 Ms. Manju is present in person and is ictentified by her counsel. She states that the Petitioners and
Respondent No.2/Complainant have entered into a Compromise. In terms of the settlemcnt, staternents for the first motion of divorce by rnutual consent have been recorded. As flill and final settlement of all the clairns of the
I{espondcnt No. 2, the Pctitioner No. t has to pay {3.20 lakhs out of which w.P.(cRL) 1396/2011
2011:DHC:18273 t1.10 lakhs have already been paid to her and {1.60 lakhs have been paid her today in cash and Rs. 50,000/- will be paid to Respondent No' 2 at the timc of rccording of the statement for second motion of divorce by mutual consent. She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she cloes not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
In vicw of the fact that the parties have arnicably resolved their differences of their own fi'ee will, volition and without any coercion and no useful putpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create fuilher acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
Consequently, FIR No. 6112010 under Sections 498N406134 IPC r-egistered at PS Kapashera, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby cluashed.
Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court.
"m.l ,# Ihc petition is disposed of. Order dasti. t*,t trAt4 J
S ",\-"t' ,RCffEIt 13, Z}rr/'vn' l<Attfu, w.p.(cRL) r3s6/2orl fr,"^h4"18-
'MUKTA GUPTA, J.
13.10.2011 lhis is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 6Il20L0 under Sections
498A/406/34IPC registered at PS Kapashcra, Delhr. fhe complainant/Respondent No. 2 Ms. Manju is present in person and is ictentified by her counsel. She states that the Petitioners and
Respondent No.2/Complainant have entered into a Compromise. In terms of the settlemcnt, staternents for the first motion of divorce by rnutual consent have been recorded. As flill and final settlement of all the clairns of the
I{espondcnt No. 2, the Pctitioner No. t has to pay {3.20 lakhs out of which w.P.(cRL) 1396/2011
2011:DHC:18273 t1.10 lakhs have already been paid to her and {1.60 lakhs have been paid her today in cash and Rs. 50,000/- will be paid to Respondent No' 2 at the timc of rccording of the statement for second motion of divorce by mutual consent. She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she cloes not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
In vicw of the fact that the parties have arnicably resolved their differences of their own fi'ee will, volition and without any coercion and no useful putpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create fuilher acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
Consequently, FIR No. 6112010 under Sections 498N406134 IPC r-egistered at PS Kapashera, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby cluashed.
Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court.
"m.l ,# Ihc petition is disposed of. Order dasti. t*,t trAt4 J
S ",\-"t' ,RCffEIt 13, Z}rr/'vn' l<Attfu, w.p.(cRL) r3s6/2orl fr,"^h4"18-
'MUKTA GUPTA, J.
f /il,h "l r'r* e,)rt)*'
'ffi-*n"l''
9 su-,H44
5q.*.^qfu-*J-
S{g-.rG
(-s ..t1,u<-^*_\
C*r*,=-fr Ef',r.'
\ I ia,^5.{., Cn^*k*- _) c>1h /
\ *-t^--.et-tDt^.. ll*D
)
2011:DHC:18273
'ffi-*n"l''
9 su-,H44
5q.*.^qfu-*J-
S{g-.rG
(-s ..t1,u<-^*_\
C*r*,=-fr Ef',r.'
\ I ia,^5.{., Cn^*k*- _) c>1h /
\ *-t^--.et-tDt^.. ll*D
)
2011:DHC:18273
JUDGMENT