Full Text
Translation output
a 39# $- HIGH COURT OF DELHI w.P.(cru-) 948120rr
SANJEEV BHEL @ VICKY & ORS. ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. R.S. Malik, Advocate .
SANJEEV BHEL @ VICKY & ORS. ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. R.S. Malik, Advocate .
VERSUS
STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel for the State with Ms. Laxmi Chauhan, Advocate with SI Rajni
Kant.
Respondent No. 2 in Person.
Through: Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel for the State with Ms. Laxmi Chauhan, Advocate with SI Rajni
Kant.
Respondent No. 2 in Person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
'h 13.10.2011 By this petition the Petitioners for quashing of FIR No. 7912011 under
Sections 3301348134IPC registered at PS Patel Nagar, Delhi.
The Cornplainant/Respondent No. 2 Ms. Geeta is present in person and is identified by the Investigating Officer. She states that the Petitioners ancl Respondent No.2/Complainant have entered into a Compromise and the compromise deed dated 2nd June, 20lI is annexed at page 25 ofthe petition.
In vicw of the settlement arrived at between the parties the Respondent No.2 does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
Page I of 2 w.P.(cRL) e48/2011 2011:DHC:16400
In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own fi'ee will, volition and without any coercion and no useful pulpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the saute would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the intercst of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
Consequently, FIR No. 7912011 under Sections 3301348134 IPC registercd at PS Patel Nagar, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed, subject to depositing Rs. 50,000/- with the Prirne Minister
Rclief Fund within four weeks fiom today by the Petitioner No. 1. The cost has been irnposed because there are a number of cases against the Petitioner
No. 1 relating to minor offences.
Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgrnent of their statements rnade before this Court.
The petition is disposed of. Order dasti.
W//'"rL.
MUKTA GUPTA. J. ocToBIlR 13, 20ll ' tvnt -h1 vbY
>'4'f-'r' ' V/ \"' tt.47 P. Gi{) s 4 s/2 o 1 I
V
-t"nw' $qo' :h5& E;TgAi^@ ,^ ,,*"0bt2 yq5""P 'i;:;""lQ'
@of 2 J^'4/ '^ os'\n{ ,^ n* 2011:DHC:16400
'h 13.10.2011 By this petition the Petitioners for quashing of FIR No. 7912011 under
Sections 3301348134IPC registered at PS Patel Nagar, Delhi.
The Cornplainant/Respondent No. 2 Ms. Geeta is present in person and is identified by the Investigating Officer. She states that the Petitioners ancl Respondent No.2/Complainant have entered into a Compromise and the compromise deed dated 2nd June, 20lI is annexed at page 25 ofthe petition.
In vicw of the settlement arrived at between the parties the Respondent No.2 does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
Page I of 2 w.P.(cRL) e48/2011 2011:DHC:16400
In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own fi'ee will, volition and without any coercion and no useful pulpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the saute would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the intercst of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
Consequently, FIR No. 7912011 under Sections 3301348134 IPC registercd at PS Patel Nagar, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed, subject to depositing Rs. 50,000/- with the Prirne Minister
Rclief Fund within four weeks fiom today by the Petitioner No. 1. The cost has been irnposed because there are a number of cases against the Petitioner
No. 1 relating to minor offences.
Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgrnent of their statements rnade before this Court.
The petition is disposed of. Order dasti.
W//'"rL.
MUKTA GUPTA. J. ocToBIlR 13, 20ll ' tvnt -h1 vbY
>'4'f-'r' ' V/ \"' tt.47 P. Gi{) s 4 s/2 o 1 I
V
-t"nw' $qo' :h5& E;TgAi^@ ,^ ,,*"0bt2 yq5""P 'i;:;""lQ'
@of 2 J^'4/ '^ os'\n{ ,^ n* 2011:DHC:16400
JUDGMENT