Full Text
Translation output
r- r HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 1253/2011
ANURADHA RAJ BHANDARI Petitioner
Through Mr. Sunil Mittal for Mr. Maldeep Sidhu, Adv.
CRL.M.C. 1253/2011
ANURADHA RAJ BHANDARI Petitioner
Through Mr. Sunil Mittal for Mr. Maldeep Sidhu, Adv.
VERSUS
-STATE Respondent
Through Mr. Saleem Ahmed, ASC for State.
Through Mr. Saleem Ahmed, ASC for State.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
ORDER o/o 13.10.2011 By this petition the Petitioner has sought modification of the order dated 28^'' March, 2011 whereby while granting bail the condition was imposed on the Petitioner not to leave the country without prior permission ofthe Court. During the pendency of the present petition, the parties have amicably settled the matter. Copy ofthe settlement agreement has been filed by the parties. As per the terms of settlement Shri Sahil Mehta would be entitledto take his passport fromthe InvestigatingOfficer.
Learned Additional Standing Counsel points out that the charge-sheet has been filed and the passport has been filed before the learned Trial Court along with the charge-sheet.
CRL.M.C. 1253/2011 page 1 of2
2011:DHC:10087 In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, the Learned
Trial Court is directed to release the passport of Shri Sahil Mehta as and when-desired by him. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that he will file separate petition seeking quashing ofFIR on the basis ofcompromise.
The present petition is disposed ofwith the direction that the order dated 28^^ March, 2011 is modified to the extent that the Petitioner and Shri
Sahil Mehta canleave the country without thepriorpermission of the Court.
Order dasti.
MUKTA GUPTA,J OCTOBER 13, 2011 'ga'
ORDER o/o 13.10.2011 By this petition the Petitioner has sought modification of the order dated 28^'' March, 2011 whereby while granting bail the condition was imposed on the Petitioner not to leave the country without prior permission ofthe Court. During the pendency of the present petition, the parties have amicably settled the matter. Copy ofthe settlement agreement has been filed by the parties. As per the terms of settlement Shri Sahil Mehta would be entitledto take his passport fromthe InvestigatingOfficer.
Learned Additional Standing Counsel points out that the charge-sheet has been filed and the passport has been filed before the learned Trial Court along with the charge-sheet.
CRL.M.C. 1253/2011 page 1 of2
2011:DHC:10087 In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, the Learned
Trial Court is directed to release the passport of Shri Sahil Mehta as and when-desired by him. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that he will file separate petition seeking quashing ofFIR on the basis ofcompromise.
The present petition is disposed ofwith the direction that the order dated 28^^ March, 2011 is modified to the extent that the Petitioner and Shri
Sahil Mehta canleave the country without thepriorpermission of the Court.
Order dasti.
MUKTA GUPTA,J OCTOBER 13, 2011 'ga'
CRL.M.C. 1253/2011 page 2 of2
2011:DHC:10087
2011:DHC:10087
JUDGMENT