Bharam Singh v. State

Delhi High Court · 13 Oct 2011 · 2011:DHC:10035
Mukta Gupta
CRL.M.C. 204/2010
2011:DHC:10035
criminal petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The High Court dismissed the petition and stay application for non-prosecution due to the petitioners' counsel's absence and failure to appear.

Full Text
Translation output
$-2 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 204/2010 & Crl.M.A. 741/2010 (stay)
BHARAM SINGH & ANR Petitioner
Through None
VERSUS
STATE Respondent
Through Mr. Mukesh Gupta, APP for State with SI Jaivir Singh, PS Fatehpur
Beri.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
«/o 13.10.2011 Despite pass-over none is present onbehalfofthePetitioner. Even on the last date an adjournment was sought as the arguing counsel was not available.
Petition andapplication aredismissed fornon-prosecution.
'ga' U A/fTTlirTA fiTTPTA..
MUKTA GUPTA,J OCTOBER 13, 2011 2011:DHC:10035
JUDGMENT